Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106698›Full record

Observational studyWomen's health (London, England)

Gender disparities in patient education provided during patient visits with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease.

Rebecca S Hilleary, Sarah M Jabusch, Becky Zheng, Michael R Jiroutek, Charles A Carter

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The public's perceptions of patient safety in healthcare.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca S HillearyDepartment of Clinical Research, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
Sarah M JabuschDepartment of Clinical Research, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3607-6221
Becky ZhengDepartment of Clinical Research, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
Michael R JiroutekDepartment of Clinical Research, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
Charles A CarterDepartment of Clinical Research, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4302-0402
Campbell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in females in the United States. Prior studies have reported that females receive less patient education and preventive counseling for cardiovascular disease as compared with males. The American Heart Association and others have embarked on several initiatives over the last 20 years to narrow this disparity of care. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a gender disparity remains in the provision of patient education among patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease, a form of cardiovascular disease. The secondary objective was to determine whether there is an association between the provision of patient education and sociodemographic variables and risk factors.

methodsThis was a retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study of adults (⩾18 years) diagnosed with coronary heart disease who participated in National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between the years 2005 and 2014, inclusive. Chi-square tests of independence were performed to address the primary objective. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to assess the association between gender and provision of patient education while adjusting for sociodemographic variables and risk factors of interest.

resultsA total raw survey sample size of 17,332 patient visits meeting the study inclusion/exclusion criteria was utilized. Patients were predominately white, male, non-Hispanic, and ⩾75 years of age. Females had 0.86 times the odds of receiving patient education compared with males (95% confidence interval = 0.78-0.95, p = 0.0024). After adjusting for covariates of interest, gender remained statistically significant in the multivariable logistic model. In addition, the variables "other payer" (vs private insurance), tobacco use, primary care physician type, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension were found to be statistically significantly associated with the provision of patient education (p < 0.05) in the multivariable analysis.

conclusionIn the data analyzed, gender disparities exist, as evidenced by a greater proportion of males receiving patient education than females, among coronary heart disease patients during visits seeking medical care. The acceptability of these findings in terms of overall patient management and treatment goals requires further evaluation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCigarette SmokingCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care SurveysHumansHyperlipidemiasHypertensionLogistic ModelsMaleObesityPatient Education as TopicRetrospective Studiescoronary heart diseasecounselingdisparityeducationgender

Identifiers

PMID31106698
PMCPMC6535750
OpenAlexW2946697438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.