Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106522›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2019

A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby-friendly Hospital status.

Emmanuelle Robert, Isabelle Michaud-Létourneau, Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet, Béatrice Swennen, Roland Devlieger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuelle RobertSchool of Public Health, Research Center of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3036-7044
Isabelle Michaud-LétourneauDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2969-2779
Michèle Dramaix-WilmetSchool of Public Health, Research Center of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Béatrice SwennenSchool of Public Health, Research Center of Health Policy and Systems - International Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Roland DevliegerDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out in Wallonia (the southern region of Belgium) in which a 20-question breastfeeding (BF) module was included in an immunization survey. The purpose of this paper is to compare exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) prevalences and BF practices for mothers giving birth in Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and non-BFHI maternity facilities. A total of 557 mothers responded to BF questions when their child was 18-24 months old; 26.7% of them delivered in a BFHI maternity facility. At discharge, a larger proportion of children were exclusively breastfed if they were born in a BFHI maternity facility (76.5% vs. 65.8%, p = .02). The median duration of EBF (15.0 vs. 12.9 weeks, p = .3), and the proportion of children exclusively breastfed at 5 months (16.8% vs 15.8%, p = 1.0) were similar in both groups. Few mothers knew that EBF was recommended for the first 6 months of life (28.6% in BFHI vs 23.1% in non-BFHI, p = .2). For most groups of the population examined, the rates of BF tended to be higher in BFHI facilities, but many differences were not significant. More specifically, BFHI seemed to boost BF practices among mothers more likely to breastfeed, but the Initiative did not seem to trigger enhanced BF practices in mothers traditionally less likely to breastfeed (except for indifferent/negative partner's attitude and mothers of Belgian origin). Influencing the BF practices of mothers less likely to breastfeed requires a special attention with complementary actions in maternity facilities as well as in community services.

Indexed as

AdultBelgiumBreast FeedingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitals, MaternityHumansInfantMothersRetrospective StudiesBaby-Friendly Hospital Initiativebreastfeeding durationbreastfeeding initiationbreastfeeding promotionexclusive breastfeedingpublic health

Identifiers

PMID31106522
PMCPMC6859970
OpenAlexW2946174289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.