Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106491›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2019

Newborn physical condition and breastfeeding behaviours: Secondary outcomes of a cluster-randomized trial of prenatal lipid-based nutrient supplements in Bangladesh.

Md Barkat Ullah, Malay K Mridha, Charles D Arnold, Susana L Matias, Md Showkat A Khan, Zakia Siddiqui, Mokbul Hossain, Rina Rani Paul, Kathryn G Dewey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Barkat UllahDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9988-3568
Malay K MridhaCenter for Non-communicable Disease and Nutrition, James P. Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Charles D ArnoldDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Susana L MatiasDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Md Showkat A KhanCenter for Non-communicable Disease and Nutrition, James P. Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Zakia SiddiquiHealth System and Population Studies Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mokbul HossainCenter for Non-communicable Disease and Nutrition, James P. Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rina Rani PaulDivision of Health, CARE Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kathryn G DeweyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
University of California, Davis · USBRAC University · BDInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal nutritional supplements may improve birth outcomes. This study aims to examine the effect of prenatal lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS), compared with iron and folic acid (IFA), on general newborn physical condition and feeding behaviours. We conducted a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial that enrolled 4,011 pregnant women at ≤20 gestational weeks. LNS and IFA were provided to women in 48 and 16 clusters, respectively, for daily consumption until delivery. We collected data on household socio-economic, food insecurity, and maternal characteristics during early pregnancy and on newborn condition and feeding within 72 hr of delivery. We analysed intervention effects on these secondary outcomes using mixed models with analysis of covariance for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for dichotomous outcomes. Among 3,664 live births, intervention groups did not differ in newborn response, mother's rating of the general condition of her newborn, early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF), suckling ability, or frequency and exclusivity of breastfeeding in the first 24 hr. If the mother perceived her infant to be healthy, EIBF was more likely (OR [95% CI]: 2.08 [1.46, 2.97]) and frequency of breastfeeding in the first 24 hr was greater (mean difference [95% CI]: 3.0 [1.91, 4.01]), but there was no difference in exclusive breastfeeding in the first 24 hr. Newborn condition and early breastfeeding practices were not affected by giving mothers prenatal LNS versus IFA. However, early breastfeeding practices were related to maternal perception of her newborn's condition. Thus, interventions to improve breastfeeding practices for newborns with poorer perceived health status may be useful.

Indexed as

Prenatal CareAdolescentAdultBreast FeedingDietary SupplementsFemaleFolic AcidHumansInfantInfant HealthInfant, NewbornIronLipidsMaleMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPregnancyFolic AcidIronLipidsbreastfeedingmaternal nutritionnewborn healthnewborn response

Identifiers

PMID31106491
PMCPMC6859973
OpenAlexW2945774156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.