Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106346›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2019

A cost-effectiveness analysis of maternal and neonatal health interventions in Ethiopia.

Solomon Tessema Memirie, Mieraf Taddesse Tolla, Dawit Desalegn, Mengistu Hailemariam, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Stéphane Verguet, Kjell Arne Johansson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Solomon Tessema MemirieDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mieraf Taddesse TollaDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Dawit DesalegnDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mengistu HailemariamInternational Reproductive Health Training Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ole Frithjof NorheimDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, N Bergen, Norway.
Stéphane VerguetDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Kjell Arne JohanssonDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, N Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOHarvard Global Health Institute · USAddis Ababa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethiopia is one of the sub-Saharan African countries contributing to the highest number of maternal and neonatal deaths. Coverage of maternal and neonatal health (MNH) interventions has remained very low in Ethiopia. We examined the cost-effectiveness of selected MNH interventions in an Ethiopian setting. We analysed 13 case management and preventive MNH interventions. For all interventions, we used an ingredients-based approach for cost estimation. We employed a static life table model to estimate the health impact of a 20% increase in intervention coverage relative to the baseline. We used disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) as the health outcome measure while costs were expressed in 2018 US$. Analyses were based on local epidemiological, demographic and cost data when available. Our finding shows that 12 out of the 13 interventions included in our analysis were highly cost-effective. Interventions targeting newborns such as neonatal resuscitation (institutional), kangaroo mother care and management of newborn sepsis with injectable antibiotics were the most cost-effective interventions with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US$7, US$8 and US$17 per DALY averted, respectively. Obstetric interventions (induction of labour, active management of third stage of labour, management of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and maternal sepsis, syphilis treatment and tetanus toxoid during pregnancy) and safe abortion cost between US$100 and US$300 per DALY averted. Calcium supplementation for pre-eclampsia and eclampsia prevention was the least cost-effective, with a cost per DALY of about US$3100. Many of the MNH interventions analysed were highly cost-effective, and this evidence can inform the ongoing essential health services package revision in Ethiopia. Our analysis also shows that calcium supplementation does not appear to be cost-effective in our setting.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesPerinatal CarePregnancyQuality-Adjusted Life Yearscost-effectiveness analysisEthiopiaMaternal and neonatal health

Identifiers

PMID31106346
PMCPMC6661540
OpenAlexW2946495925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.