Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106219›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ICT (Lausanne, Switzerland)2018

Toward a Neurobiological Basis for Understanding Learning in University Modeling Instruction Physics Courses.

Eric Brewe, Jessica E Bartley, Michael C Riedel, Vashti Sawtelle, Taylor Salo, Emily R Boeving, Elsa I Bravo, Rosalie Odean, Alina Nazareth, Katherine L Bottenhorn and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ICT (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eric BreweDepartment of Physics, School of Education, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jessica E BartleyDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Michael C RiedelDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Vashti SawtelleLyman Briggs College, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, United States.
Taylor SaloDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Emily R BoevingDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Elsa I BravoDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Rosalie OdeanDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Alina NazarethDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Katherine L BottenhornDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Robert W LairdDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Matthew T SutherlandDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Shannon M PrudenDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Angela R LairdDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Florida International University · USDrexel University · USMichigan State University · USTemple University · US

Funding

The FIU Research Center in a Minority Institution (FIU-RCMI)U54MD012393 · NIMHD · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MARY JO TREPKA · 2017 to 2026
$32.1M
FIU-ABCD: Pathways and Mechanisms to Addiction in the Latino Youth of South FloridaU01DA041156 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Raul Gonzalez, Angela R Laird · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
Impact of HIV and cannabis on brain function: Regions, networks, and the connectoK01DA037819 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI SUTHERLAND, MATTHEW T · 2014 to 2018
$784k
Neuroimaging meta-analytics for addiction: Nodes, networks,and new heuristicsR01DA041353 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI LAIRD, ANGELA R, SUTHERLAND, MATTHEW T · 2017 to 2019
$645k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA037819NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041353NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041156NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling Instruction (MI) for University Physics is a curricular and pedagogical approach to active learning in introductory physics. A basic tenet of science is that it is a model-driven endeavor that involves building models, then validating, deploying, and ultimately revising them in an iterative fashion. MI was developed to provide students a facsimile in the university classroom of this foundational scientific practice. As a curriculum, MI employs conceptual scientific models as the basis for the course content, and thus learning in a MI classroom involves students appropriating scientific models for their own use. Over the last 10 years, substantial evidence has accumulated supporting MI's efficacy, including gains in conceptual understanding, odds of success, attitudes toward learning, self-efficacy, and social networks centered around physics learning. However, we still do not fully understand the mechanisms of how students learn physics and develop mental models of physical phenomena. Herein, we explore the hypothesis that the MI curriculum and pedagogy promotes student engagement via conceptual model building. This emphasis on conceptual model building, in turn, leads to improved knowledge organization and problem solving abilities that manifest as quantifiable functional brain changes that can be assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We conducted a neuroeducation study wherein students completed a physics reasoning task while undergoing fMRI scanning before (pre) and after (post) completing a MI introductory physics course. Preliminary results indicated that performance of the physics reasoning task was linked with increased brain activity notably in lateral prefrontal and parietal cortices that previously have been associated with attention, working memory, and problem solving, and are collectively referred to as the central executive network. Critically, assessment of changes in brain activity during the physics reasoning task from pre- vs. post-instruction identified increased activity after the course notably in the posterior cingulate cortex (a brain region previously linked with episodic memory and self-referential thought) and in the frontal poles (regions linked with learning). These preliminary outcomes highlight brain regions linked with physics reasoning and, critically, suggest that brain activity during physics reasoning is modifiable by thoughtfully designed curriculum and pedagogy.

Indexed as

brain networkfMRIforce concept inventorymental modelsmodeling instructionneuroeducationphysics reasoningSTEM learning

Identifiers

PMID31106219
PMCPMC6519462
OpenAlexW2803640954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.