Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106129›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2019

Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the lung: a SEER analysis.

Takefumi Komiya, Achuta Kumar Guddati, Yukihiro Nakanishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takefumi KomiyaHematology/Medical Oncology, Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, IN, USA.
Achuta Kumar GuddatiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Yukihiro NakanishiDepartment of Pathology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCA) in lung has been considered as a rare subtype of lung adenocarcinoma. However, recent classifications of lung adenocarcinoma proposed to discontinue CCA due to lack of available data with clinical significance. Patients with CCA and lung adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (LANOS) were queried from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Cancer-specific survival was studied according to gender (male, female), age (0-69, 70+), SEER specific stage A system (localized, regional and distant), year of diagnosis (1973-2000, 2001-2013), surgery (yes, no), and radiation therapy (yes, no) using Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate analysis was used to study independent predictors of cancer-specific survival. A total of 1,227 and 233,154 patients with the diagnosis of CCA and LANOS respectively were found in the SEER database. CCA histology was significantly associated with an early year of diagnosis, younger age, early stage, surgery, and lack of radiation. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with CCA histology had significantly better cancer-specific survival (P<0.0001, Log-Rank). Subset analysis demonstrated the difference in cancer-specific survival between CCA and NOS histology was significant in localized and regional but not distant stage disease (P=0.0453, 0.0009, 0.0664, respectively). Patients with CCA histology have superior survival in the locoregional stage according to our SEER analysis, suggesting its unique role in prognosis despite it being removed from recent pathologic classifications.

Indexed as

cancer-specific survivalclear cell adenocarcinoma (CCA)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)

Identifiers

PMID31106129
PMCPMC6504654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.