Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106092›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

Use of a Smartphone Application for Spine Surgery Improves Patient Adherence with Preoperative Instructions and Decreases Last-minute Surgery Cancellations.

Jeffrey J Stewart, Islam Fayed, Shawnda Henault, Babak Kalantar, Jean-Marc Voyadzis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Last-minute cancellation of adult patients scheduled for cardiothoracic surgery in a large Dutch tertiary care centre.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey J StewartMiscellaneous, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Islam FayedNeurosurgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA.
Shawnda HenaultMiscellaneous, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Babak KalantarOrthopaedics, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA.
Jean-Marc VoyadzisNeurosurgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphone applications (apps) are being increasingly utilized in the health care arena to improve patient care and outcomes.

objectiveTo further demonstrate the ability of a smartphone app to improve patient compliance with preoperative instructions and to decrease the number of last-minute surgery cancellations.

methodsPatients undergoing spine surgery were prospectively accrued. Smartphone app users were compared to non-app users. Patient adherence with preoperative instructions as well as last-minute surgery cancellations were analyzed.

resultsAll 85 app users adhered to preoperative instructions according to the acknowledgements sent to the web portal, and there were no cancelled surgeries. Among the 89 non-app users, there were five cancelled surgeries (5.6%).

conclusionsWe demonstrate the ability of a smartphone application to improve patient adherence with preoperative instructions and decrease last-minute surgery cancellations.

Indexed as

mobile applicationspatient satisfactionperioperative caresmartphonesurgical cancellations

Identifiers

PMID31106092
PMCPMC6504025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.