Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106051›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Predicting gene expression using DNA methylation in three human populations.

Huan Zhong, Soyeon Kim, Degui Zhi, Xiangqin Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Huan ZhongDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Soyeon KimSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Degui ZhiSchool of Biomendical Informatics, University of Texas Health Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Xiangqin CuiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Emory University · USHong Kong Baptist University · HKThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Sex Related Determinants Of Pain In FibromyalgiaP60AR048095 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2002 to 2012
$11.7M
Next-Generation Bioinformatics for Next-Generation SequencingR01HG008115 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI YU, FULI, ZHANG, KUI · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008115NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR048095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation, an important epigenetic mark, is well known for its regulatory role in gene expression, especially the negative correlation in the promoter region. However, its correlation with gene expression across genome at human population level has not been well studied. In particular, it is unclear if genome-wide DNA methylation profile of an individual can predict her/his gene expression profile. Previous studies were mostly limited to association analyses between single CpG site methylation and gene expression. It is not known whether DNA methylation of a gene has enough prediction power to serve as a surrogate for gene expression in existing human study cohorts with DNA samples other than RNA samples.

resultsWe examined DNA methylation in the gene region for predicting gene expression across individuals in non-cancer tissues of three human population datasets, adipose tissue of the Multiple Tissue Human Expression Resource Projects (MuTHER), peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) from Asthma and normal control study participates, and lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) from healthy individuals. Three prediction models were investigated, single linear regression, multiple linear regression, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalized regression. Our results showed that LASSO regression has superior performance among these methods. However, the prediction power is generally low and varies across datasets. Only 30 and 42 genes were found to have cross-validation R

conclusionIn our three population analyses DNA methylation of CpG sites at gene region have limited prediction power for gene expression across individuals with linear regression models. The prediction power potentially varies depending on tissue, cell type, and data sources. In our analyses, the combination of LASSO regression and all probes not excluding any probe on the methylation array provides the best prediction for gene expression.

Indexed as

DNA methylationLASSOMethylation microarrayTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31106051
PMCPMC6500370
OpenAlexW2892313722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.