Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106048›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices and experimental design for genomic studies.

Pável Matos-Maraví, Camila Duarte Ritter, Christopher J Barnes, Martin Nielsen, Urban Olsson, Niklas Wahlberg, Daniel Marquina, Ilari Sääksjärvi, Alexandre Antonelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pável Matos-MaravíDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Camila Duarte RitterDepartment of Eukaryotic Microbiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3371-7425
Christopher J BarnesNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-4233
Martin NielsenNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3718-526X
Urban OlssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Niklas WahlbergDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-3363
Daniel MarquinaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ilari SääksjärviBiodiversity Unit, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Alexandre AntonelliDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1842-9297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively parallel DNA sequencing opens up opportunities for bridging multiple temporal and spatial dimensions in biodiversity research, thanks to its efficiency to recover millions of nucleotide polymorphisms. Here, we identify the current status, discuss the main challenges, and look into future perspectives on biodiversity genomics focusing on insects, which arguably constitute the most diverse and ecologically important group among all animals. We suggest 10 simple rules that provide a succinct step-by-step guide and best-practices to anyone interested in biodiversity research through the study of insect genomics. To this end, we review relevant literature on biodiversity and evolutionary research in the field of entomology. Our compilation is targeted at researchers and students who may not yet be specialists in entomology or molecular biology. We foresee that the genomic revolution and its application to the study of non-model insect lineages will represent a major leap to our understanding of insect diversity.

Indexed as

EvolutionHigh-throughput sequencingInsect genomicsMuseomicsTaxonomic impediment

Identifiers

PMID31106048
PMCPMC6499058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.