Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31105976›Full record

Trial reportStroke and vascular neurology2019

It is safe to use transdermal glyceryl trinitrate to lower blood pressure in patients with acute ischaemic stroke with carotid stenosis.

Jason P Appleton, Lisa J Woodhouse, Andrew Belcher, Daniel Bereczki, Eivind Berge, Valeria Caso, Hui Meng Chang, Hanne K Christensen, Ronan Collins, John Gommans and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Glyceryl trinitrate for the treatment of ischaemic stroke: Determining efficacy in rodent and ovine species for enhanced clinical translation.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 12 countries.

Jason P AppletonStroke, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-4410
Lisa J WoodhouseStroke, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Andrew BelcherStroke, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Daniel BereczkiDepartment of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eivind BergeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Valeria CasoStroke Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Hui Meng ChangDepartment of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Hanne K ChristensenNeurology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ronan CollinsTallaght Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
John GommansDepartment of Medicine, Hawke's Bay District Health Board, Hastings, New Zealand.
Ann C LaskaDepartment of Clinical Science, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
George NtaiosDepartment of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Serefnur OzturkNeurology, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.
Gillian M SareNeurology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Szabolcs SzatmariDepartment of Neurology, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Targu Mures, Romania.
Yongjun WangNeurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9976-2341
Joanna M WardlawCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.
Nikola SpriggStroke, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Philip M BathStroke, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNFrederiksberg Hospital · DKHawke's Bay Hospital · NZKarolinska Institutet · SEOslo University Hospital · NOSelçuk University · TRSemmelweis University · HUSingapore General Hospital · SGTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is concern that blood pressure (BP) lowering in acute stroke may compromise cerebral perfusion and worsen outcome in the presence of carotid stenosis. We assessed the effect of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) in patients with carotid stenosis using data from the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) Trial. Methods: ENOS randomised 4011 patients with acute stroke and raised systolic BP (140-220 mm Hg) to transdermal GTN or no GTN within 48 hours of onset. Those on prestroke antihypertensives were also randomised to stop or continue their medication for 7 days. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at day 90. Ipsilateral carotid stenosis was split: <30%; 30-<50%; 50-<70%; ≥70%. Data are ORs with 95% CIs adjusted for baseline prognostic factors. Results: 2023 (60.5%) ischaemic stroke participants had carotid imaging. As compared with <30%, ≥70% ipsilateral stenosis was associated with an unfavourable shift in mRS (worse outcome) at 90 days (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.44, p<0.001). Those with ≥70% stenosis who received GTN versus no GTN had a favourable shift in mRS (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.93, p=0.024). In those with 50-<70% stenosis, continuing versus stopping prestroke antihypertensives was associated with worse disability, mood, quality of life and cognition at 90 days. Clinical outcomes did not differ across bilateral stenosis groups. Conclusions: Following ischaemic stroke, severe ipsilateral carotid stenosis is associated with worse functional outcome at 90 days. GTN appears safe in ipsilateral or bilateral carotid stenosis, and might improve outcome in severe ipsilateral carotid stenosis.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCarotid StenosisFemaleFunctional StatusHumansHypertensionIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedNitroglycerinRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsNitroglycerinVasodilator Agentsacute strokeblood pressurecarotid stenosisglyceryl trinitratesafety

Identifiers

PMID31105976
PMCPMC6475087
OpenAlexW2925224553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.