Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31105888›Full record

ArticleSleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)

Gender differences in the application of anthropometric measures for evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea.

Daniel Ninello Polesel, Karen Tieme Nozoe, Sergio Brasil Tufik, Andreia Gomes Bezerra, Maria Teresa Bechere Fernandes, Lia Bittencourt, Sergio Tufik, Monica Levy Andersen, Helena Hachul

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Female Patients in Primary Care: Time for Improvement?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Ninello PoleselUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Karen Tieme NozoeUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Sergio Brasil TufikUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Andreia Gomes BezerraUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Maria Teresa Bechere FernandesUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Pediatria - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Lia BittencourtUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Sergio TufikUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Pediatria - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Monica Levy AndersenUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Helena HachulUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate anthropometric measures and their effectiveness as screening method for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in each gender. We also evaluated which measures were associated with OSA in the adult population of a large metropolitan city, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 552 women and 450 men were submitted to polysomnography (PSG), and the anthropometric measurements as body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio, neck and waist circumference were collected. The measurements were then compared with the OSA classification established by the PSG. In women, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio were found to be the best predictor, while in men, the factors with great potential for identification varied according to severity of the disease, highlighting waist-to-height ratio, neck circumference and BMI had strongest association. The accuracy of the classification in relation to mild-to-severe OSA based on cut-off values of 92.5cm for waist circumference was greater than 72.9% in men, and 78.9% in women based on cut off values of 95cm. Regarding severe OSA, cut-off values of 116.1cm were greater than 91.3% accurate in the male population, and 95.1% in the female population with a cut-off value of 126.5cm. The study found waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio to be the best measure to assess sleep-disordered breathing in women. Waist-to-height ratio and neck circumferences were the best measures in men with mild OSA, but BMI was more closely associated with severe OSA. The present study identified the anthropometric variables with the highest risk for OSA and their respective cutoff value, according to gender.

Indexed as

Abdominal ObesityBody Mass IndexSleepWaist CircumferenceWaist-Height Ratio

Identifiers

PMID31105888
PMCPMC6508944
OpenAlexW2942722677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.