ArticleOncotarget2019
Genomic landscape analyses of reprogrammed cells using integrative and non-integrative methods reveal variable cancer-associated alterations.
Article in Oncotarget, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Landscape of iPSC Haplobanks.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Deciphering the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Prognostic insights from programmed death genes using machine learning.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- [Human cells for therapeutics purpose: State of the art].Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent development of cell reprogramming technologies brought a major hope for future cell therapy applications by the use of these cells or their derivatives. For this purpose, one of the major requirements is the absence of genomic alterations generating a risk of cell transformation. Here we analyzed by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization human iPSC generated by two non-integrative and one integrative method at pluripotent stage as well as in corresponding teratomas. We show that all iPSC lines exhibit copy number variations (CNV) of several genes deregulated in oncogenesis. These cancer-associated genomic alterations were more pronounced in virally programmed hiPSCs and their derivative teratoma as compared to those found in iPSC generated by mRNA-mediated reprogramming. Bioinformatics analysis showed the involvement of these genes in human leukemia and carcinoma. We conclude that genetic screening should become a standard procedure to ensure that hiPSCs are free from cancer-associated genomic alterations before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.