ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2018
Competitive Tuning Among Ca
Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fitting and comparison of calcium-calmodulin kinetic schemes to a common data set using non-linear mixed effects modelling.PloS one · 2025Article
- Making time and space for calcium control of neuron activity.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2023Review
- A Modeling and Analysis Study Reveals That CaMKII in Synaptic Plasticity Is a Dominant Affecter in CaM Systems in a T286 Phosphorylation-Dependent Manner.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Overcoming Compensatory Mechanisms toward Chronic Drug Administration to Ensure Long-Term, Sustainable Beneficial Effects.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCalcium/Calmodulin-dependent (Ca
methodsHere, we extend our previous deterministic model of competition among CBPs to include phosphodiesterases, AMPAR receptors that are important in synaptic plasticity, and enzymatic function of CBPs: cAMP regulation, kinase activity, and phosphatase activity. After rigorous parameterization and validation by global sensitivity analysis using Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) and Partial Rank Correlation Coefficients (PRCC), we explore how perturbing the competitive pool of CBPs influences downstream signaling events. In particular, we hypothesize that although perturbations may decrease activation of one CBP, increased activation of a separate, but enzymatically-related CBP could compensate for this loss, providing a homeostatic effect. RESULTS AND
conclusionsFirst we compare dynamic model output of two models: a two-state model of Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.