ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Evaluation of hemodynamics in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by vector flow mapping: Comparison with healthy subjects.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolving Role of Cardiac Imaging in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Clinical Practice.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Intracardiac fluid dynamic analysis: available techniques and novel clinical applications.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Review
- Early impact of albuminuria on cardiac function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Mexican guidelines 2024 for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Article
- Influence of a single hemodialysis on left ventricular energy loss and wall shear stress in patients with uremic cardiomyopathy assessed with vector flow mapping.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Amount of dissipative energy loss when assessing left ventricular dysfunction in female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Heart and vessels · 2022Article
- Evaluation of left ventricular function by vector flow mapping in females with systemic lupus erythematosus.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Hemodynamic change in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy before and after alcohol septal ablation using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective observational study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Observational
- Energy loss by right ventricular pacing: Patients with versus without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Article
- Assessment of left ventricular energy loss using vector flow mapping in patients with stages 1-3 chronic kidney disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study investigated the role of energy loss assessed by vector flow mapping (VFM) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). VFM analysis was performed in 42 patients with HCM and in 40 control subjects, which were matched for age, sex and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. The intra-LV and left atrial blood flow were obtained from the apical 3-chamber view, and the energy loss (EL) during the systolic and diastolic phases was calculated. The measurements were averaged over three cardiac cycles and indexed to body surface area. Compared with the controls, the left ventricular energy loss (LVEL)-total value was significantly decreased in patients with HCM during the diastolic phase (P1, P2 and P3; all P<0.05). A tendency for increased systolic LVEL-total values was observed in the patients with HCM compared with the controls (P>0.05). LVEL-base values were decreased in the patients with HCM during P1 and P2 (slow filling time). Compared with the controls, patients with HCM had lower LVEL-mid values during the diastolic phases (P0, P1, P2 and P3; all P<0.05). However, the LVEL-mid value of patients with HCM was higher compared with that of the controls during systolic P5 (P<0.05). LVEL-apex was decreased in patients with HCM during P0, P2 and P3. Compared with the controls, the left atrial energy loss (LAEL) of all three phases in patients with HCM were lower (each P<0.01). The diastolic LVEL values were significantly lower in patients with HCM compared with the controls; however, the systolic LVEL levels tended to be higher in HCM. The LAEL of the reservoir phase, conduit phase and atrial systolic phase were decreased in HCM compared with controls. The present study demonstrated that measurement of EL by VFM is a sensitive method of determining subclinical LV dysfunction in patients with HCM. The value of EL has been considered to be a quantitative parameter for the estimation of the efficiency of intraventricular blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.