Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31105735›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2019

Livestock Genomics for Developing Countries - African Examples in Practice.

Karen Marshall, John P Gibson, Okeyo Mwai, Joram M Mwacharo, Aynalem Haile, Tesfaye Getachew, Raphael Mrode, Stephen J Kemp

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Addressing the 2050 demand for terrestrial animal source food.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Karen MarshallLivestock Genetics Program, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
John P GibsonSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Okeyo MwaiLivestock Genetics Program, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joram M MwacharoSmall Ruminant Breeding and Genomics Group, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Aynalem HaileSmall Ruminant Breeding and Genomics Group, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tesfaye GetachewSmall Ruminant Breeding and Genomics Group, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Raphael MrodeLivestock Genetics Program, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Stephen J KempLivestock Genetics Program, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
International Livestock Research Institute · KEEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research · ETUniversity of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African livestock breeds are numerous and diverse, and typically well adapted to the harsh environment conditions under which they perform. They have been used over centuries to provide livelihoods as well as food and nutritional security. However, African livestock systems are dynamic, with many small- and medium-scale systems transforming, to varying degrees, to become more profitable. In these systems the women and men livestock keepers are often seeking new livestock breeds or genotypes - typically those that increase household income through having enhanced productivity in comparison to traditional breeds while maintaining adaptedness. In recent years genomic approaches have started to be utilized in the identification and development of such breeds, and in this article we describe a number of examples to this end from sub-Saharan Africa. These comprise case studies on: (a) dairy cattle in Kenya and Senegal, as well as sheep in Ethiopia, where genomic approaches aided the identification of the most appropriate breed-type for the local productions systems; (b) a cross-breeding program for dairy cattle in East Africa incorporating genomic selection as well as other applications of genomics; (c) ongoing work toward creating a new cattle breed for East Africa that is both productive and resistant to trypanosomiasis; and (d) the use of African cattle as resource populations to identify genomic variants of economic or ecological significance, including a specific case where the discovery data was from a community based breeding program for small ruminants in Ethiopia. Lessons learnt from the various case studies are highlighted, and the concluding section of the paper gives recommendations for African livestock systems to increasingly capitalize on genomic technologies.

Indexed as

Africabreeding programgenetic improvement strategygenomicslivestocksmallholdSNP

Identifiers

PMID31105735
PMCPMC6491883
OpenAlexW2940714046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.