ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2019
A Model-Based Assessment of the Seizure Onset Zone Predictive Power to Inform the Epileptogenic Zone.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning applied to epilepsy: bibliometric and visual analysis from 2004 to 2023.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Virtual epilepsy patient cohort: Generation and evaluation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Virtual resection evaluation based on sEEG propagation network for drug-resistant epilepsy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Parameter estimation in a whole-brain network model of epilepsy: Comparison of parallel global optimization solvers.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- The role of additive and diffusive coupling on the dynamics of neural populations.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Virtual intracranial EEG signals reconstructed from MEG with potential for epilepsy surgery.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Dynamical Network Models From EEG and MEG for Epilepsy Surgery-A Quantitative Approach.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Optimization of epilepsy surgery through virtual resections on individual structural brain networks.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Patient-Specific Network Connectivity Combined With a Next Generation Neural Mass Model to Test Clinical Hypothesis of Seizure Propagation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Computational modelling in source space from scalp EEG to inform presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Precursors of seizures due to specific spatial-temporal modifications of evolving large-scale epileptic brain networks.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Revealing epilepsy type using a computational analysis of interictal EEG.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Quantification and Selection of Ictogenic Zones in Epilepsy Surgery.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy surgery is a clinical procedure that aims to remove the brain tissue responsible for the emergence of seizures, the epileptogenic zone (EZ). It is preceded by an evaluation to determine the brain tissue that must be resected. The identification of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) from intracranial EEG recordings stands as one of the key proxies for the EZ. In this study we used computational models of epilepsy to assess to what extent the SOZ may or may not represent the EZ. We considered a set of different synthetic networks (e.g., regular, small-world, random, and scale-free networks) to represent large-scale brain networks and a phenomenological network model of seizure generation. In the model, the SOZ was inferred from the seizure likelihood (SL), a measure of the propensity of single nodes to produce epileptiform dynamics, whilst a surgery corresponded to the removal of nodes and connections from the network. We used the concept of node ictogenicity (NI) to quantify the effectiveness of each node removal on reducing the network's propensity to generate seizures. This framework enabled us to systematically compare the SOZ and the seizure control achieved by each considered surgery. Specifically, we compared the distributions of SL and NI across different networks. We found that SL and NI were concordant when all nodes were similarly ictogenic, whereas when there was a small fraction of nodes with high NI, the SL was not specific at identifying these nodes. We further considered networks with heterogeneous node excitabilities, i.e., nodes with different susceptibilities of being engaged in seizure activity, to understand how such heterogeneity may affect the relationship between SL and NI. We found that while SL and NI are concordant when there is a small fraction of hyper-excitable nodes in a network that is otherwise homogeneous, they do diverge if the network is heterogeneous, such as in scale-free networks. We observe that SL is highly dependent on node excitabilities, whilst the effect of surgical resections as revealed by NI is mostly determined by network structure. Together our results suggest that the SOZ is not always a good marker of the EZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.