Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31105466›Full record

ArticleSpatial cognition and computation2019

Which way is the bookstore? A closer look at the judgments of relative directions task.

Derek J Huffman, Arne D Ekstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spatial cognition and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Derek J HuffmanCenter for Neuroscience, University of California.
Arne D EkstromCenter for Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience Graduate Group, University of California, Davis; Psychology Department, University of Arizona.

Funding

Representation of spatiotemporal information in human episodic memory and navigationR01NS076856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARNE D EKSTROM · 2012 to 2026
$4.8M
Determining the effects of encoding conditions on spatial representations in the human brainF32MH116577 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HUFFMAN, DEREK JAMES · 2018 to 2019
$123k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH116577NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a detailed analysis of a widely used assay in human spatial cognition, the judgments of relative direction (JRD) task. We conducted three experiments involving virtual navigation interspersed with the JRD task, and included confidence judgments and map drawing as additional metrics. We also present a technique for assessing the similarity of the cognitive representations underlying performance on the JRD and map drawing tasks. Our results support the construct validity of the JRD task and its connection to allocentric representation. Additionally, we found that chance performance on the JRD task depends on the distribution of the angles of participants' responses, rather than being constant and 90 degrees. Accordingly, we present a method for better determining chance performance.

Indexed as

cognitive mapgroup-level nonparametric permutation testjudgments of relative direction (JRD)map drawing taskmap sketching

Identifiers

PMID31105466
PMCPMC6519130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.