Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31105435›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine insights. Pediatrics2019

Assessment of Motor Skills in Children With Visual Impairment: A Systematic and Integrative Review.

Hanne Alves Bakke, Wiviane Abreu Cavalcante, Ilana Santos de Oliveira, Silvia Wanick Sarinho, Maria Teresa Cattuzzo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07703150 (Promoting the Psychophysical Well-Being of Children and Adolescents With Visual Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07703150 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Promoting the Psychophysical Well-Being of Children and Adolescents With Visual Impairment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversità degli Studi di TrentoRan2027 to 2028Enrolled20ConditionsVisual Impairment, Cerebral Visual Impairment, Visual ImpairmentsArmsAdapted Physical Activity Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparing paediatric optometric vision care in Canada over a 14-year period.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Brief Form of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 for Individuals with Visual Impairments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanne Alves BakkeIFPB, Patos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9113-7560
Wiviane Abreu CavalcanteUniversidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-6632
Ilana Santos de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Silvia Wanick SarinhoUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-3323
Maria Teresa CattuzzoUniversidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7841-1211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to review and examine the tools used to assess psychomotor performance of children with visual impairment. Databases, such as SCOPUS, MEDLINE/PubMed, Medline/EBSCO, Web of Science, LILACS, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect, were searched using Mesh terms. Data from manuscripts fully available in these databases between 1994 and 2017 (except CINAHL-2014) concerning the evaluation, tool development, or intervention for the improvement of motor skills in children (age, 7-10 years) with visual impairment were collected. The Critical Review Form-Quantitative Studies was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. As a result, 1113 articles were found, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria; 66.7% of the articles had moderate quality, with unsatisfactory results regarding the validity and reliability of the tools used to assess these children, as well as the absence of clinical importance and practical application in such studies. Only the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 and Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 described data on the validation and reliability in visually impaired children. To minimize systematic errors and improve the quality of the investigations, increasing the number of studies regarding the tools, functionality of their activities, and testing the adaptions is necessary.

Indexed as

data collectionMethodspsychomotor performance

Identifiers

PMID31105435
PMCPMC6503598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.