ArticleScientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading2019
Reading and the Neurocognitive Bases of Statistical Learning
Article in Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- All together now: Random Forests analysis reveals the joint impact of multiple statistical regularities on eye-movements during reading.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Statistical learning in spelling and reading.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Quantifying word informativeness and its impact on eye-movement reading behavior: Cross-linguistic variability and individual differences.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Impaired visual and verbal statistical learning in children with Dyslexia in a transparent orthography.Annals of dyslexia · 2025Article
- The Role of Sleep in Memory Consolidation and Reading in Dyslexia.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2025Review
- Speech Stream Composition Affects Statistical Learning: Behavioral and Neural Evidence.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Memory representations are flexibly adapted to orthographic systems: A comparison of English and Hebrew.Brain research · 2024Article
- Statistical learning and children's emergent literacy in rural Côte d'Ivoire.Developmental science · 2024Article
- Does Nonlinguistic Segmentation Predict Literacy in Second Language Education? Statistical Learning in Ivorian Primary Schools.Language learning · 2023Article
- Intact procedural memory and impaired auditory statistical learning in adults with dyslexia.Neuropsychologia · 2023Article
- Double trouble: Using spellings of different lengths to represent vowel length in English.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2023Article
- Failure to consolidate statistical learning in developmental dyslexia.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Number and Syllabification of Following Consonants Influence Use of Long Versus Short Vowels in English Disyllables.Journal of memory and language · 2023Article
- How you read affects what you gain: Individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system predict intervention gains in children with reading disabilities.Journal of educational psychology · 2022Article
- Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming : Affix frequency in masked priming.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Article
- Artificial grammar learning is facilitated by distributed practice: Evidence from a letter reordering task.Cognitive processing · 2022Article
- Probabilistic Decision-Making in Children With Dyslexia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Explicit Instructions Do Not Enhance Auditory Statistical Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Language statistical learning responds to reinforcement learning principles rooted in the striatum.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- The Dramatic Impact of Explicit Instruction on Learning to Read in a New Writing System.Psychological science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The processes underlying word reading are shaped by statistical properties of the writing system. According to some theoretical perspectives (e.g. Harm & Seidenberg, 2004) reading acquisition should be understood as an exercise in statistical learning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.