ArticleJournal of applied statistics2019
Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Protein Identifications.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CoMPaseD: advanced planning of proteomic experiments aiming to identify small proteins.microLife · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In proteomics, identification of proteins from complex mixtures of proteins extracted from biological samples is an important problem. Among the experimental technologies, Mass-Spectrometry (MS) is the most popular one. Protein identification from MS data typically relies on a "two-step" procedure of identifying the peptide first followed by the separate protein identification procedure next. In this setup, the interdependence of peptides and proteins are neglected resulting in relatively inaccurate protein identification. In this article, we propose a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based Bayesian hierarchical model, a first of its kind in protein identification, which integrates the two steps and performs joint analysis of proteins and peptides using posterior probabilities. We remove the assumption of independence of proteins by using clustering group priors to the proteins based on the assumption that proteins sharing the same biological pathway are likely to be present or absent together and are correlated. The complete conditionals of the proposed joint model being tractable, we propose and implement a Gibbs sampling scheme for full posterior inference that provides the estimation and statistical uncertainties of all relevant parameters. The model has better operational characteristics compared to two existing "one-step" procedures on a range of simulation settings as well as on two well-studied datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.