Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31105357›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in personality2018

A double-edged sword? Sub-types of psychological flexibility are associated with distinct psychiatric disorders.

Denckla C A, Consedine N S, Chung W J, Stein M, Roche M, Blais M

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in personality, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Denckla C AHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Consedine N SUniversity of Auckland, School of Medicine, New Zealand.
Chung W JPsychological Assessment and Research Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, One Bowdoin Square, Boston, MA, 02114 USA.
Stein MPsychological Assessment and Research Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, One Bowdoin Square, Boston, MA, 02114 USA.
Roche MDepartment of Psychology, Penn State Altoona, 3000 Ivyside Park, Altoona, PA 16601, USA.
Blais MPsychological Assessment and Research Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, One Bowdoin Square, Boston, MA, 02114 USA.

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH114370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychological flexibility is associated with both better and worse health outcomes. The objective of this study was to differentiate two types of psychological flexibility - affective instability and interpersonal flexibility - and to estimate associations with psychiatric disorders.

methodStudy participants were drawn from a large outpatient psychiatric sample that completed standard assessment batteries at an academic hospital (

resultsLess interpersonal flexibility was associated with depressive diagnoses. Greater affective instability was associated with bipolar disorder and was negatively associated with psychotic disorders, but showed no association with depressive disorders.

conclusionDiffering degrees of flexibility and instability in emotional and interpersonal domains may be uniquely associated with specific classes of psychological disorders.

Indexed as

affective labilityinterpersonal flexibilitypsychiatric disorderspsychological flexibility

Identifiers

PMID31105357
PMCPMC6516491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.