Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31105219›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Studio One: A New Teaching Model for Exploring Bio-Inspired Design and Fabrication.

Simon Schleicher, Georgios Kontominas, Tanya Makker, Ioanna Tatli, Yasaman Yavaribajestani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon SchleicherDepartment of Architecture, College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, 232 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1800, USA. simon_s@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0560-8122
Georgios KontominasDepartment of Architecture, College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, 232 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1800, USA. georgios_kontominas@berkeley.edu.
Tanya MakkerDepartment of Architecture, College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, 232 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1800, USA. tanya_makker@berkeley.edu.
Ioanna TatliDepartment of Architecture, College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, 232 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1800, USA. ioanna_tatli@berkeley.edu.
Yasaman YavaribajestaniDepartment of Architecture, College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, 232 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1800, USA. yasamanyavari@berkeley.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing specialization in architecture has clearly left its marks not only on the general profession but also on architectural education. Many universities around the world react to this development by offering primarily conventional and overly discipline-specific courses that often lack bold new concepts. To remedy this situation, the authors propose an alternative teaching model called Studio One, which seeks to facilitate new dynamic links between architecture and other disciplines based on the interplay between fundamental research, design exploration, and practical application. The goal is to develop an interdisciplinary, collaborative design training that encompasses the best that nature has to teach us, realized through the technology that humans have achieved. At the core of this class is the study of biological structures and the development of bio-inspired construction principles for architectural design. Both aspects are rich sources of innovation and can play an important role in the training of future architects and engineers. This paper seeks to provide a coherent progress report. After a brief introduction to the general objectives of Studio One, the authors will specify the methods and 21st century skills that students learned during this class. Relying on four student capstone projects as examples, the paper will then go into more detail on how natural structures can inspire a new design process, in which students abstract basic biomimetic principles and transfer them into the construction of architectural prototypes and pavilions. Finally, the authors conclude by discussing the particular successes and challenges facing this teaching model and identify the key improvements that may give this program an even bigger impact in the future.

Indexed as

architectural educationbio-inspirationbiomimeticsfiber compositesparametric designstructural analysisstructures

Identifiers

PMID31105219
PMCPMC6631298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.