Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31105211›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2019

An Overview of Bioinspired and Biomimetic Self-Repairing Materials.

Olga Speck, Thomas Speck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Testing the Limits: Functional Strengths and Weaknesses of Poacher (Agonidae) Armor.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. COInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid Solidification of Plant Latices fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Toward understanding the fast latex coagulation inIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olga SpeckPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestr. 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. olga.speck@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8705-5121
Thomas SpeckPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestr. 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. thomas.speck@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2245-2636

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC-Transregio 141 'Biological Design and Integrative Structures-Analysis, Simulation and Implementation in Architecture'Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Sustainability Center Freiburg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the 3.8 billion years of biological evolution, a multitude of functional principles has been developed in all kingdoms of life enabling the sealing and healing of diverse types of damage. Inspired by this treasure trove, biologists and engineers have become increasingly interested in learning from biological insights for the development of self-repairing materials. In this review, particular attention is paid to the systematic transfer of knowledge from wound reactions in biological role models to technical applications with self-repair function. This knowledge transfer includes bioinspiration in terms of the conscious implementation of an idea from nature or biomimetics in the form of a systematic transfer of underlying functional principles found in selected biological role models. The current overview presents a selection of breakthroughs regarding bioinspired or biomimetic self-repairing materials, including the initial basic publications and the recent publications of the last eight years. Each reviewed publication is presented with reference to three key criteria: (i) self-repair mechanisms in plants or animals as role models; (ii) knowledge transfer from living nature to technology; and (iii) bioinspired or biomimetic materials with self-repair function. Finally, damage control is discussed with a focus on damage prevention and damage management.

Indexed as

animalsdamage controldamage managementdamage preventionfunctional principleplantsself-healingself-sealing

Identifiers

PMID31105211
PMCPMC6477613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.