Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31104832›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2019

Immunogenicity of full and fractional dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine for use in routine immunisation and outbreak response: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Cynthia J Snider, Khalequ Zaman, Concepcion F Estivariz, Mohammad Yunus, William C Weldon, Kathleen A Wannemuehler, M Steven Oberste, Mark A Pallansch, Steven Gf Wassilak, Tajul Islam A Bari and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02847026 (Immunogenicity of a Booster Dose of Fractional Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02847026 phase4completednot on this map

Immunogenicity of a Booster Dose of Fractional Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine (fIPV) Delivered Intradermally Concomitantly With Rotavirus Vaccines

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2016 to 2017Enrolled1,144ConditionsPoliomyelitisArmsIPV at 14 and 22 weeks of age, Rotarix, IPV at 14 and 22 weeks of age, RotaTeq, IPV at 14 and fIPV at 22 weeks, Rotarix, IPV at 14 and fIPV at 22 weeks, RotaTeq, IPV at 6 and fIPV at 22 weeks, Rotarix
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Immunogenicity of Fractional Dose Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine in India.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cynthia J SniderUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: csnider@cdc.gov.
Khalequ ZamanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Concepcion F EstivarizUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mohammad YunusInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
William C WeldonUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kathleen A WannemuehlerUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M Steven ObersteUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark A PallanschUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Steven Gf WassilakUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tajul Islam A BariInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abhijeet AnandUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BD

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntradermal administration of fractional inactivated poliovirus vaccine (fIPV) is a dose-sparing alternative to the intramuscular full dose. We aimed to compare the immunogenicity of two fIPV doses versus one IPV dose for routine immunisation, and also assessed the immunogenicity of an fIPV booster dose for an outbreak response.

methodsWe did an open-label, randomised, controlled, inequality, non-inferiority trial in two clinics in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Healthy infants were randomly assigned at 6 weeks to one of four groups: group A received IPV at age 14 weeks and IPV booster at age 22 weeks; group B received IPV at age 14 weeks and fIPV booster at age 22 weeks; group C received IPV at age 6 weeks and fIPV booster at age 22 weeks; and group D received fIPV at 6 weeks and 14 weeks and fIPV booster at age 22 weeks. IPV was administered by needle-syringe as an intramuscular full dose (0·5 mL), and fIPV was administered intradermally (0·1 mL of the IPV formulation was administered using the 0·1 mL HelmJect auto-disable syringe with a Helms intradermal adapter). Both IPV and fIPV were administered on the outer, upper right thigh of infants. The primary outcome was vaccine response to poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 at age 22 weeks (routine immunisation) and age 26 weeks (outbreak response). Vaccine response was defined as seroconversion from seronegative (<1:8) at baseline to seropositive (≥1:8) or four-fold increase in reciprocal antibody titres adjusted for maternal antibody decay and was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (infants who received polio vaccines per group assignment and polio antibody titre results to serotypes 1, 2, and 3 at 6, 22, 23, and 26 weeks of age). The non-inferiority margin was 12·5%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02847026.

findingsBetween Sept 1, 2016 and May 2, 2017, 1076 participants were randomly assigned and included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 271 in Group A, 267 in group B, 268 in group C, and 270 in group D. Vaccine response at 22 weeks to two doses of fIPV (group D) was significantly higher (p<0·0001) than to one dose of IPV (groups A and B) for all three poliovirus serotypes: the type 1 response comprised 212 (79% [95% CI 73-83]) versus 305 (57% [53-61]) participants, the type 2 response comprised 173 (64% [58-70]) versus 249 (46% [42-51]) participants, and the type 3 response comprised 196 (73% [67-78]) versus 196 (36% [33-41]) participants. At 26 weeks, the fIPV booster was non-inferior to IPV (group B vs group A) for serotype 1 (-1·12% [90% CI -2·18 to -0·06]), serotype 2 (0·40%, [-2·22 to 1·42]), and serotype 3 (1·51% [-3·23 to -0·21]). Of 129 adverse events, 21 were classified as serious including one death; none were attributed to IPV or fIPV.

interpretationfIPV appears to be an effective dose-sparing strategy for routine immunisation and outbreak responses.

fundingUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralBangladeshDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryInfantInjections, IntramuscularMalePoliomyelitisPoliovirusPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralPoliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID31104832
PMCPMC7069654
OpenAlexW2945450369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.