ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2019
The Genomic Medicine Integrative Research Framework: A Conceptual Framework for Conducting Genomic Medicine Research.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Building capacity for genomics in primary care: a scoping review of practitioner attitudes, education needs, and enablers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- What is the power of a genomic multidisciplinary team approach? A systematic review of implementation and sustainability.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Recommendations for return of secondary genomic findings in observational cohort studies.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- A Community-Engaged Approach to Enhancing Participation in Genomic Research in Rare and Understudied Cancer Populations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Primary Care Provider Perspectives on Expanded Genomic Screening in Children.Research square · 2025Article
- A Guide for Implementing DPYD Genotyping for Systemic Fluoropyrimidines into Clinical Practice.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Optimising the mainstreaming of renal genomics: Complementing empirical and theoretical strategies for implementation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- When families bridge the research-clinical divide: An exploration of values regarding cascade screening in genomic research.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Employing effective recruitment and retention strategies to engage a diverse pediatric population in genomics research.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Nephrologists' Views on a Workflow for Returning Genetic Results to Research Participants.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for adult screening.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Article
- Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A theory- and empirically informed evaluation framework.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Attitudes about pharmacogenomic testing vary by healthcare specialty.Pharmacogenomics · 2023Article
- Age-Based Genomic Screening during Childhood: Ethical and Practical Considerations in Public Health Genomics Implementation.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- Lessons learned while starting multi-institutional genetics research in diverse populations: A report from the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- A mainstreaming oncogenomics model: improving the identification of Lynch syndrome.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Precision medicine in Australia: now is the time to get it right.The Medical journal of Australia · 2022Article
- Design and rationale of GUARDD-US: A pragmatic, randomized trial of genetic testing for APOL1 and pharmacogenomic predictors of antihypertensive efficacy in patients with hypertension.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Article
- Best-worst scaling methodology to evaluate constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: application to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant therapy.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conceptual frameworks are useful in research because they can highlight priority research domains, inform decisions about interventions, identify outcomes and factors to measure, and display how factors might relate to each other to generate and test hypotheses. Discovery, translational, and implementation research are all critical to the overall mission of genomic medicine and prevention, but they have yet to be organized into a unified conceptual framework. To fill this gap, our diverse team collaborated to develop the Genomic Medicine Integrative Research (GMIR) Framework, a simple but comprehensive tool to aid the genomics community in developing research questions, strategies, and measures and in integrating genomic medicine and prevention into clinical practice. Here we present the GMIR Framework and its development, along with examples of its use for research development, demonstrating how we applied it to select and harmonize measures for use across diverse genomic medicine implementation projects. Researchers can utilize the GMIR Framework for their own research, collaborative investigations, and clinical implementation efforts; clinicians can use it to establish and evaluate programs; and all stakeholders can use it to help allocate resources and make sure that the full complexity of etiology is included in research and program design, development, and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.