Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31104629›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

The impact of monetary incentives on referrals by traditional birth attendants for postnatal care in Nigeria.

Adanna Chukwuma, Chinyere Mbachu, Margaret McConnell, Thomas J Bossert, Jessica Cohen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02936869 (Incentives for Postnatal Care Demand), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02936869 nacompletednot on this map

Incentives for Postnatal Care Demand

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Ran2016 to 2016Enrolled207ConditionsMaternal Death, Neonatal DeathArmsPerformance-based monetary incentives
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adanna ChukwumaHealth, Nutrition, and Population Global Practice, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 20433, USA. adc785@mail.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-7633
Chinyere MbachuHealth Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
Margaret McConnellDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Thomas J BossertDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Jessica CohenDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGaps in postnatal care use represent missed opportunities to prevent maternal and neonatal death in sub-Saharan Africa. As one in every three non-facility deliveries in Nigeria is assisted by a traditional birth attendant (TBA), and the TBA's advice is often adhered to by their clients, engaging TBAs in advocacy among their clients may increase maternal and neonatal postnatal care use. This study estimates the impact of monetary incentives for maternal referrals by TBAs on early maternal and neonatal postnatal care use (within 48 h of delivery) in Nigeria.

methodsWe conducted a non-blinded, individually-randomized, controlled study of 207 TBAs in Ebonyi State, Nigeria between August and December 2016. TBAs were randomly assigned with a 50-50 probability to receive $2.00 for every maternal client that attended postnatal care within 48 h of delivery (treatment group) or to receive no monetary incentive (control group). We compared the probabilities of maternal and neonatal postnatal care use within 48 h of delivery in treatment and control groups in an intention-to-treat analysis. We also ascertained if the care received by mothers and newborns during these visits followed World Health Organization guidelines.

resultsOverall, 207 TBAs participated in this study: 103 in the treatment group and 104 in the control group. The intervention increased the proportion of maternal clients of TBAs that reported attending postnatal care within 48 h of delivery by 15.4 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9-22.9]. The proportion of neonatal clients of TBAs that reportedly attended postnatal care within 48 h of delivery also increased by 12.6 percentage points [95% CI: 5.9-19.3]. However, providers often did not address the issues that may have led to maternal and newborn postnatal complications during these visits.

conclusionsWe show that motivating TBAs using monetary incentives for maternal postnatal care use can increase skilled care use after delivery among their maternal and neonatal clients, who have a higher risk of mortality because of their exposure to unskilled birth attendance. However, improving the quality of care is key to ensuring maternal and neonatal health gains from postnatal care attendance.

trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered in clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02936869 ) on October 18, 2016.

Indexed as

Reimbursement, IncentiveFemaleHumansMidwiferyNigeriaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePostnatal CarePregnancyReferral and ConsultationHealthIncentivesMaternalNeonatalPostnatalReferralsTraditional birth attendants

Identifiers

PMID31104629
PMCPMC6526614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.