Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31104604›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Context matters: using reinforcement learning to develop human-readable, state-dependent outbreak response policies.

W J M Probert, S Lakkur, C J Fonnesbeck, K Shea, M C Runge, M J Tildesley, M J Ferrari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Preface to theme issue 'Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: epidemic forecasting and control'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Detection, forecasting and control of infectious disease epidemics: modelling outbreaks in humans, animals and plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

W J M Probert1 Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford , Oxford OX3 7LF , UK.
S Lakkur2 Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, TN 37203 , USA.
C J Fonnesbeck2 Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, TN 37203 , USA.
K Shea3 Department of Biology, Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA 16802 , USA.
M C Runge4 US Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center , Laurel, MD 20708 , USA.
M J Tildesley5 Department of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL , UK.
M J Ferrari3 Department of Biology, Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA 16802 , USA.

Funding

Linking models and policy: Using active adaptive management for optimal control of disease outbreaksR01GM105247 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI FERRARI, MATTHEW · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K010972/4NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of all possible epidemics of a given infectious disease that could occur on a given landscape is large for systems of real-world complexity. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that the control actions that are optimal, on average, over all possible epidemics are also best for each possible epidemic. Reinforcement learning (RL) and Monte Carlo control have been used to develop machine-readable context-dependent solutions for complex problems with many possible realizations ranging from video-games to the game of Go. RL could be a valuable tool to generate context-dependent policies for outbreak response, though translating the resulting policies into simple rules that can be read and interpreted by human decision-makers remains a challenge. Here we illustrate the application of RL to the development of context-dependent outbreak response policies to minimize outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease. We show that control based on the resulting context-dependent policies, which adapt interventions to the specific outbreak, result in smaller outbreaks than static policies. We further illustrate two approaches for translating the complex machine-readable policies into simple heuristics that can be evaluated by human decision-makers. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: epidemic forecasting and control'. This theme issue is linked with the earlier issue 'Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: approaches and important themes'.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicable DiseasesDecision MakingDisease OutbreaksForecastingHumansModels, BiologicalFMDmachine learningoptimal controloutbreak responsereinforcement learningvaccination

Identifiers

PMID31104604
PMCPMC6558555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.