Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31104476›Full record

Trial reportClinical rehabilitation2019

Stroke patients' and non-professional coaches' experiences with home-based constraint-induced movement therapy: a qualitative study.

Anne Stark, Christine Färber, Britta Tetzlaff, Martin Scherer, Anne Barzel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05053529 (Effects of Mirror Therapy and Constrained Induced Movement Therapy in Upper Limb Rehabilitation Among Chronic Stroke Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05053529 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Mirror Therapy and Constrained Induced Movement Therapy in Upper Limb Rehabilitation Among Chronic Stroke Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled36ConditionsStrokeArmsMirror therapy, CIMT group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne Stark1 Department of General Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6471-0242
Christine Färber2 Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.
Britta Tetzlaff1 Department of General Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin Scherer1 Department of General Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anne Barzel1 Department of General Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the experiences of chronic stroke patients and non-professional coaches with home-based constraint-induced movement therapy (homeCIMT).

designQualitative study embedded within a cluster randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of homeCIMT to improve the use of the affected arm in daily activities.

settingPatients' home environment.

participants13 stroke patients and 9 non-professional coaches' alias family members who had completed the four-week homeCIMT programme in the context of the HOMECIMT trial.

interventionsSemi-structured interviews; qualitative data were analysed using the methodology of the hermeneutic phenomenological data analysis.

resultsWe identified six themes in the qualitative analysis describing the experiences of patients and non-professional coaches with homeCIMT: (1) homeCIMT can be integrated into everyday life with varying degrees of success; (2) training together may produce positive experiences as well as strain; (3) self-perceived improvements during and following homeCIMT; (4) using the affected arm in everyday life is challenging; (5) subjective evaluation of and experiences with homeCIMT-specific exercises; and (6) impact of professional therapists' guidance and motivation during homeCIMT. Statements regarding theme five and six were only provided by patients, whereas the other themes contain both, the experiences of stroke patients and non-professional coaches.

conclusionPatients' and non-professional coaches' narratives offer a detailed insight into the manifold experiences with the practical implementation of homeCIMT that may help improve implementing the homeCIMT programme and similar approaches involving increased training duration and intensity and/or involvement of family members.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthFemaleHemiplegiaHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedStrokeStroke RehabilitationUpper Extremityconstraint-induced movement therapyfamily involvementhome rehabilitationqualitative studyStroke

Identifiers

PMID31104476
PMCPMC6716206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.