ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019
Cardio-Oncology Fellowship Training and Education.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Cardio-Oncology: A Survey-Based Study Conducted by the Heart Failure Association of the Polish Cardiac Society and the Polish Society of Clinical Oncology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of cardio-oncology knowledge and practice among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia: a comprehensive nationwide survey.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Cardio-Oncologic Knowledge of Nurses in the Oncology Service: A Multi-Center Survey in China.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Training and Career Development in Cardio-Oncology Translational and Implementation Science.Heart failure clinics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWith the rapid development of novel cancer therapeutics and the growing number of cancer survivors, there is significant demand for cardio-oncology experts to care for these patients. As such, it has become increasingly necessary to develop formalized training in the field of cardio-oncology. This review will focus on the current state of cardio-oncology education, with recommendations for the development of dedicated cardio-oncology fellowships. RECENT
findingsCardio-oncology fellowships should be affiliated with high-volume centers that have established cardio-oncology clinical and research programs with dedicated cardio-oncology faculty. Several recent publications have proposed recommendations to develop uniform cardio-oncology training standards, core curricula, and evaluation metrics. With the rapid evolution of the field and the support of various profession organizations, the number and quality of dedicated cardio-oncology fellowship programs is expected to increase significantly. The adoption of defined training requirements and evaluation standards to measure competency will be essential to ensure the legitimacy and success of the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31104193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.