Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31104180›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019

The Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Cardiac Toxicity From Cancer Therapeutics.

Aaron Soufer, Lauren A Baldassarre

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Adverse cardiovascular events in patients treated with mogamulizumab.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron SouferDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 789 Howard Avenue, Dana 322, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Lauren A BaldassarreDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 789 Howard Avenue, Dana 322, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. lauren.baldassarre@yale.edu.
Dana (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe emerging complexity of cardiac toxicity caused by cancer therapies has created demand for more advanced non-invasive methods to better evaluate cardiac structure, function, and myocardial tissue characteristics. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging meets these needs without exposure to ionizing radiation, and with superior spatial resolution. RECENT

findingsSpecial applications of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess for cancer therapy-induced cardiac toxicity include the detection of subclinical LV dysfunction through novel methods of measuring myocardial strain, detection of microcirculatory dysfunction, identification of LV and LA fibrosis, and more sensitive detection of inflammation caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors. CMR plays a significant role in the non-invasive workup of cardiac toxicity from cancer therapies, with recent advancements in the field that have opened avenues for further research and development.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesCancer therapeutics–related cardiac dysfunctionCardiac magnetic resonance imagingLate gadolinium enhancementMyocardial perfusion

Identifiers

PMID31104180
OpenAlexW2945240793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.