Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31104179›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2019

Comparative transcriptome profiling of the response to Pyrenochaeta lycopersici in resistant tomato cultivar Mogeor and its background genotype-susceptible Moneymaker.

Justyna Milc, P Bagnaresi, M Aragona, M T Valente, C Biselli, A Infantino, E Francia, N Pecchioni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dual Transcriptome Analysis Reveals ThatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justyna MilcDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy. justynaanna.milc@unimore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6145-5445
P BagnaresiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Via San Protaso 37, 29017, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, PC, Italy.
M AragonaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification, Via C.G. Bertero 22, 00156, Rome, Italy.
M T ValenteCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification, Via C.G. Bertero 22, 00156, Rome, Italy.
C BiselliCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Via San Protaso 37, 29017, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, PC, Italy.
A InfantinoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification, Via C.G. Bertero 22, 00156, Rome, Italy.
E FranciaDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
N PecchioniDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cereal Research Centre · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding for resistance is the most effective tool for controlling the corky root disease of tomato caused by Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. A comparative RNA-Seq-based transcriptomic analysis was conducted at 96 hpi (hours post infection) on two tomato cultivars: resistant Mogeor and its genetic background, and susceptible Moneymaker to investigate the differences in their transcriptomic response and identify the molecular bases of this plant-pathogen interaction. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified was much higher in the susceptible than in the resistant genotype; however, the proportion of upregulated genes was higher in Mogeor (70.81%) than in Moneymaker (52.95%). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis enabled identification of 24 terms shared by the two cultivars that were consistent with responses to external stimulus, such as fungal infection. On the other hand, as many as 54 GO were enriched solely in Moneymaker, including terms related to defense response and cell wall metabolism. Our results could support the previous observations in other pathosystems, that susceptibility and resistance have overlapping signaling pathways and responses, suggesting that the P. lycopersici resistance gene pyl might be a recessive allele at a susceptibility locus, for which different candidate genes were identified based on the differences in induction or expression levels, observed between the resistant and susceptible genotype. MapMan analysis highlighted a complex hormone and transcription factors interplay where SA- and JA-induced pathways are modulated in a similar way in both genotypes and thus take part in a common response while the ethylene signaling pathways, induced mainly in susceptible Moneymaker, seem putatively contribute to its susceptibility.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityGene Expression Regulation, PlantAscomycotaDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsSignal TransductionSolanum lycopersicumTranscriptomePlant ProteinsCorky root diseasepyl genePyrenochaeta lycopersiciTomatoTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31104179
OpenAlexW2945707344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.