Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31104177›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Ventricular geometry-regularized QRSd predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy response: machine learning from crosstalk between electrocardiography and echocardiography.

Juan Lei, Yi Grace Wang, Luna Bhatta, Jamal Ahmed, Dali Fan, Jingfeng Wang, Kan Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan LeiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13202, USA.
Yi Grace WangDepartment of Mathematics, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA, USA.
Luna BhattaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13202, USA.
Jamal AhmedDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13202, USA.
Dali FanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Jingfeng WangDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China. drwjf@hotmail.com.
Kan LiuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13202, USA. Kan-Liu@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-9166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to one-third of patients selected by current guidelines do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the aim of this study was to find out novel analytical approaches to improve pre-implantation CRT response prediction. Among 31 pre-implantation features of clinical, laboratory, electrocardiography (ECG), and echocardiography variables in a consecutive cohort of patients receiving a first-time CRT device (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator), we developed a machine learning (ML) model with three classification algorithms (support vector machines (SVM), K nearest neighbors, and random subspaces) with the best features combination to predict CRT response. Three categorical variables, left bundle branch block (LBBB), nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and female gender, were independently associated with CRT responses. Among continuous variables, including septal wall thickness, posterior wall thickness, and relative wall thickness (RWT), could regularize ECG QRS duration (QRSd) and significantly enhance the correlation between QRSd and CRT response. The 3 ML algorithms in a total of 38 features combinations constantly recognized that the features combined with QRSd/RWT outperformed the combinations without it. For each of three algorithms, the triplet feature combination of QRSd/RWT, LBBB, and nonischemic cardiomyopathy repeatedly increased the classification rate more than 8%. The best performance for CRT response prediction occurred with SVM model, which proposed actual QRSd/RWT values that favored CRT responses in patients both with and without LBBB. Lower QRSd/RWT values were required for CRT responses in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy compared to those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. ML from ventricular remodeling characteristics-regularized QRSd improves CRT response prediction.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSupport Vector MachineAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Decision-MakingEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart FailureHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsCardiac resynchronization therapyClassificationMachine learningQRS durationVentricular geometric characteristics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.