ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019
Development of microbial community-based index of biotic integrity to evaluate the wetland ecosystem health in Suzhou, China.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating a river's ecological health: A multidimensional approach.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2024Article
- Ecological health evaluation of rivers based on phytoplankton biological integrity index and water quality index on the impact of anthropogenic pollution: A case of Ashi River Basin.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of microbial community-based biological indicators for assessing aquatic ecological status is urgently needed in heavily impaired regions, due to the local extinction of traditional indicator macro-organisms. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a microbial community-based index of biotic integrity (MC-IBI) to assess the health of wetlands in Suzhou, China. High-throughput sequencing was used to obtain information about microbial communities in wetlands and to investigate the health of the wetlands. When constructing the index, we selected what we considered were the most important environmental factors and biological parameters, and identified sensitive and tolerant species. We then used the index to evaluate the health of the inflows and outflows of 15 wetlands in Suzhou. The results showed that, of the 30 samples collected at the 10 impacted inflow sites, 2 were classified as "poor," 5 were "commonly," 18 were sub-healthy, and 5 were healthy; at the restored outflow sites, 24 were "healthy" and 6 were "sub-healthy." The health was worst at the inflows of wetlands that received agricultural effluent, followed by those that received industrial effluent, and was best at those that received urban effluent. The results from our study show that this newly developed MC-IBI gave reasonable evaluations of the health of wetland ecosystems. This application demonstrates that the evaluation system was feasible and we suggest that evaluations that further MC-IBI evaluation approaches should be developed further in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31104161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.