ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2019
Plasticity leading to cerebellum-dependent learning: two different regions, two different types.
Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Cerebellar Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability, Synaptic Plasticity, and Perineuronal Nets in Eyeblink Conditioning.Biology · 2024Review
- Intrinsic plasticity of Purkinje cell serves homeostatic regulation of fear memory.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Dynamic alteration of intrinsic properties of the cerebellar Purkinje cell during the motor memory consolidation.Molecular brain · 2023Article
- mGluR1 Regulates the Interspike Interval Threshold for Dendritic CaExperimental neurobiology · 2023Article
- New prospects on cerebellar reserve: Remarks on neuroprotective effects of experience in animals and humans.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- De Novo Synthesized Estradiol: A Role in Modulating the Cerebellar Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Changes in cerebellar intrinsic neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity result from eyeblink conditioning.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In memory research, studying cerebellum-dependent memory is advantageous due to its relatively simple neural architecture compared with that of other memory circuits. To understand how cerebellum-dependent memory develops and is stored in this circuit, numerous hypotheses have been proposed. These hypotheses are generally able to adequately explain most learning and memory processes; however, several reported results are still poorly understood. Recently, the importance of intrinsic plasticity (i.e., plasticity of intrinsic excitability) has been highlighted in several studies. Because the classical view of cerebellum-dependent eye movement learning was focused on synaptic plasticity, it is valuable to consider the intrinsic plasticity for deeper understanding. In the present review, we re-examine the utility and limitations of previous hypotheses, from classic to recent, and propose an updated hypothesis. Integrating intrinsic plasticity into current models of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) circuit may facilitate deeper understanding of the VOR adaptation process. In particular, during the period of memory transfer, dynamic changes in excitability in both cerebellar Purkinje cells and vestibular nuclear neurons illuminate the role of intrinsic plasticity in the circuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31104128What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.