Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31104086›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Auditory pitch glides influence time-to-contact judgements of visual stimuli.

Carly King, Steven L Prime

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The influence of auditory rhythms on the speed of inferred motion.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carly KingNeurocognition and Psychophysics Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, 154 Arts, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A5, Canada.
Steven L PrimeNeurocognition and Psychophysics Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, 154 Arts, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A5, Canada. steve.prime@usask.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common experimental task used to study the accuracy of estimating when a moving object arrives at a designated location is the time-to-contact (TTC) task. The previous studies have shown evidence that sound motion cues influence TTC estimates of a visual moving object. However, the extent to which sound can influence TTC of visual targets still remains unclear. Some studies on the crossmodal correspondence between pitch and speed suggest that descending pitch sounds are associated with faster speeds compared to ascending pitch sounds due to an internal model of gravity. Other studies have shown an opposite pitch-speed mapping (i.e., ascending pitch associated with faster speeds) and no influence of gravity heuristics. Here, we explored whether auditory pitch glides, a continuous pure tone sound either ascending or descending in pitch, influence TTC estimates of a vertically moving visual target and if any observed effects are consistent with a gravity-centered or gravity-unrelated pitch-speed mapping. Subjects estimated when a disc moving either upward or downward at a constant speed reached a visual landmark after the disc disappeared behind an occluder under three conditions: with an accompanying ascending pitch glide, with a descending pitch glide, or with no sound. Overall, subjects underestimated TTC with ascending pitch glides and overestimated TTC with descending pitch glides, compared to the no-sound condition. These biases in TTC were consistent in both disc motion directions. These results suggest that subjects adopted a gravity-unrelated pitch-speed mapping where ascending pitch is associated with faster speeds and descending pitch associated with slower speeds.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationPitch PerceptionYoung AdultAuditory pitchCrossmodal correspondencePrediction motionTime-to-contact

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.