Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31103785›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website.

Luca Pion-Tonachini, Ken Kreutz-Delgado, Scott Makeig

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07241260 (Boosting Brain and Mood), which is not on this map. Cited by 941 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
941citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07241260 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Boosting Brain and Mood: Exploring the Impact of Hydrate Heroes on Mental Health and Brain Activity

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of South FloridaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled48ConditionsHydration StatusArmsHydrate Heroes (6 packets), Hydrate Heroes (3 packets)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

941 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

881 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luca Pion-TonachiniSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. Electronic address: lpionton@ucsd.edu.
Ken Kreutz-DelgadoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Pattern Recognition Laboratory, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. Electronic address: kreutz@eng.ucsd.edu.
Scott MakeigSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. Electronic address: smakeig@ucsd.edu.

Funding

EEGLAB: Software for Analysis of Human Brain DynamicsR01NS047293 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig · 2004 to 2026
$10.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electroencephalogram (EEG) provides a non-invasive, minimally restrictive, and relatively low-cost measure of mesoscale brain dynamics with high temporal resolution. Although signals recorded in parallel by multiple, near-adjacent EEG scalp electrode channels are highly-correlated and combine signals from many different sources, biological and non-biological, independent component analysis (ICA) has been shown to isolate the various source generator processes underlying those recordings. Independent components (IC) found by ICA decomposition can be manually inspected, selected, and interpreted, but doing so requires both time and practice as ICs have no order or intrinsic interpretations and therefore require further study of their properties. Alternatively, sufficiently-accurate automated IC classifiers can be used to classify ICs into broad source categories, speeding the analysis of EEG studies with many subjects and enabling the use of ICA decomposition in near-real-time applications. While many such classifiers have been proposed recently, this work presents the ICLabel project comprised of (1) the ICLabel dataset containing spatiotemporal measures for over 200,000 ICs from more than 6000 EEG recordings and matching component labels for over 6000 of those ICs, all using common average reference, (2) the ICLabel website for collecting crowdsourced IC labels and educating EEG researchers and practitioners about IC interpretation, and (3) the automated ICLabel classifier, freely available for MATLAB. The ICLabel classifier improves upon existing methods in two ways: by improving the accuracy of the computed label estimates and by enhancing its computational efficiency. The classifier outperforms or performs comparably to the previous best publicly available automated IC component classification method for all measured IC categories while computing those labels ten times faster than that classifier as shown by a systematic comparison against other publicly available EEG IC classifiers.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedArtifactsBrainDatabases, FactualData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansSoftwareClassificationCrowdsourcingEEGICA

Identifiers

PMID31103785
PMCPMC6592775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.