ArticleNeuroImage2019
Variational autoencoder: An unsupervised model for encoding and decoding fMRI activity in visual cortex.
Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrastive learning to fine-tune feature extraction models for the visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Uncovering Heart Rate Response Patterns to Threat Pictures Through Deep Latent Representation Learning with a Variational Autoencoder.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Functional diversity of visual cortex improves constraint-free natural image reconstruction from human brain activity.Fundamental research · 2025Article
- Improved image reconstruction from brain activity through automatic image captioning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Compression-enabled interpretability of voxelwise encoding models.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Modeling short visual events through the BOLD moments video fMRI dataset and metadata.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Label-free photoacoustic computed tomography of visually evoked responses in the primary visual cortex and four subcortical retinorecipient nuclei of anesthetized mice.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- Brain2GAN: Feature-disentangled neural encoding and decoding of visual perception in the primate brain.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Using unsupervised capsule neural network reveal spatial representations in the human brain.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Disentangled deep generative models reveal coding principles of the human face processing network.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Neuroimaging-based classification of PTSD using data-driven computational approaches: A multisite big data study from the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD consortium.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- The Architecture of Object-Based Attention.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Review
- Dual-Guided Brain Diffusion Model: Natural Image Reconstruction from Human Visual Stimulus fMRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Neural encoding with unsupervised spiking convolutional neural network.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Covariate-informed Representation Learning to Prevent Posterior Collapse of iVAE.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2023Article
- Intelligent oncology: The convergence of artificial intelligence and oncology.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2023Review
- Brain Decoding of Multiple Subjects for Estimating Visual Information Based on a Probabilistic Generative Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Self-supervised Natural Image Reconstruction and Large-scale Semantic Classification from Brain Activity.NeuroImage · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Goal-driven and feedforward-only convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been shown to be able to predict and decode cortical responses to natural images or videos. Here, we explored an alternative deep neural network, variational auto-encoder (VAE), as a computational model of the visual cortex. We trained a VAE with a five-layer encoder and a five-layer decoder to learn visual representations from a diverse set of unlabeled images. Using the trained VAE, we predicted and decoded cortical activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) from three human subjects passively watching natural videos. Compared to CNN, VAE could predict the video-evoked cortical responses with comparable accuracy in early visual areas, but relatively lower accuracy in higher-order visual areas. The distinction between CNN and VAE in terms of encoding performance was primarily attributed to their different learning objectives, rather than their different model architecture or number of parameters. Despite lower encoding accuracies, VAE offered a more convenient strategy for decoding the fMRI activity to reconstruct the video input, by first converting the fMRI activity to the VAE's latent variables, and then converting the latent variables to the reconstructed video frames through the VAE's decoder. This strategy was more advantageous than alternative decoding methods, e.g. partial least squares regression, for being able to reconstruct both the spatial structure and color of the visual input. Such findings highlight VAE as an unsupervised model for learning visual representation, as well as its potential and limitations for explaining cortical responses and reconstructing naturalistic and diverse visual experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.