Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31103784›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Variational autoencoder: An unsupervised model for encoding and decoding fMRI activity in visual cortex.

Kuan Han, Haiguang Wen, Junxing Shi, Kun-Han Lu, Yizhen Zhang, Di Fu, Zhongming Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Architecture of Object-Based Attention.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kuan HanSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.
Haiguang WenSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.
Junxing ShiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.
Kun-Han LuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.
Yizhen ZhangSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.
Di FuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.
Zhongming LiuWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, USA; School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA. Electronic address: zmliu@purdue.edu.

Funding

Multimodal Hyperspectral Imaging of Brain Activity and ConnectivityR01MH104402 · NIMH · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, ZHONGMING · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goal-driven and feedforward-only convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been shown to be able to predict and decode cortical responses to natural images or videos. Here, we explored an alternative deep neural network, variational auto-encoder (VAE), as a computational model of the visual cortex. We trained a VAE with a five-layer encoder and a five-layer decoder to learn visual representations from a diverse set of unlabeled images. Using the trained VAE, we predicted and decoded cortical activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) from three human subjects passively watching natural videos. Compared to CNN, VAE could predict the video-evoked cortical responses with comparable accuracy in early visual areas, but relatively lower accuracy in higher-order visual areas. The distinction between CNN and VAE in terms of encoding performance was primarily attributed to their different learning objectives, rather than their different model architecture or number of parameters. Despite lower encoding accuracies, VAE offered a more convenient strategy for decoding the fMRI activity to reconstruct the video input, by first converting the fMRI activity to the VAE's latent variables, and then converting the latent variables to the reconstructed video frames through the VAE's decoder. This strategy was more advantageous than alternative decoding methods, e.g. partial least squares regression, for being able to reconstruct both the spatial structure and color of the visual input. Such findings highlight VAE as an unsupervised model for learning visual representation, as well as its potential and limitations for explaining cortical responses and reconstructing naturalistic and diverse visual experiences.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerUnsupervised Machine LearningAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPattern Recognition, VisualVisual CortexYoung AdultBayesian brainNeural codingVariational autoencoderVisual reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID31103784
PMCPMC6592726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.