ArticleExperimental eye research2019
Characterization of a functionally active primary microglial cell culture from the pig retina.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Preventive Power of the Mediterranean Diet Against Blue-Light-Induced Retinal Degeneration: Is the Secret in the Herbs and Spices?Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Neonatal sepsis as a cause of retinopathy of prematurity: An etiological explanation.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024Review
- Microglia in Cultured Porcine Retina: Qualitative Immunohistochemical Analyses of Reactive Microglia in the Outer Retina.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- LncRNAFrontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- The innate immune system in diabetic retinopathy.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021Review
- Isolation and Characterization of Primary Retinal Microglia From the Human Post-mortem Eyes for Future Studies of Ocular Diseases.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- NOD-like Receptors in the Eye: Uncovering Its Role in Diabetic Retinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal inflammation is an integral component of many retinal diseases including diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Inflammation is commonly initiated and perpetuated by myeloid-derived immune cells. In the retina, microglial cells are resident macrophages with myeloid origins, which acts as the first responders involved in the innate immune system. To understand the disease pathogenesis, the use of isolated retinal cell culture model is vital for the examination of multiple cellular responses to injury or trauma. The pig retina resembles human retina in terms of tissue architecture, vasculature, and topography. Additionally, it is a better model than the rodent retina because of the presence of the pseudomacula. In the present study, we sought to establish and characterize pig retinal primary microglial cell (pMicroglia) culture. We used pig eyes from the local abattoir and optimized pMicroglia cultures using multiple cell culture conditions and methods. The best results were obtained by seeding cells in DMEM-high glucose media for 18 days followed by shaking of the culture plate. The resulting pMicroglia were characterized by cellular morphology, phenotype, and immunostaining with Iba-1, CD68, P2Y12, CD163, CD14, and Isolectin GS-IB4. Generated pMicroglia were found functionally active in phagocytosis assay and responsive to lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in dose-dependent production of IL-1β. Furthermore, they showed increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines with LPS treatment. Thus, we report a novel and reproducible method for the isolation of primary microglial cells from pig eyes, which may be useful for studying retinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.