ArticleGastroenterology2019
Use of Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors Is Associated With Lower Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Men With Benign Colorectal Neoplasms.
Article in Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors use and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- The Role of Daily Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors in the Management of Diabetic Neuropathy-The Importance of a Multidisciplinary Approach.The world journal of men's health · 2026Review
- Could GUCY2C-targeted pharmacotherapy be effective in treating colorectal cancer?Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Assessing the impact of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors on survival in men after treatment for rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetically proxied inhibition of Phosphodiesterase-5 and cancer risks: A drug-target Mendelian randomization analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes after unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: A registry-based retrospective cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases as drug targets.Pharmacological reviews · 2025Review
- Phosphodiesterase 5 and its inhibitors with ischaemic heart disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis and a real-world study.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Article
- Repurposing of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil as a therapeutic agent to prevent gastric cancer growth through suppressing c-MYC stability for IL-6 transcription.Communications biology · 2025Article
- PDE10A as a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target in cancer: insights and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Antihypertensive drug targets and breast cancer risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- The State of Use and Utility of Negative Controls in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Review
- Advancements in Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors: Unveiling Present and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Dipyridamole enhances the anti-cancer ability of aspirin against colorectal cancer by inducing apoptosis in an unfolded protein response-dependent manner.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- A Non-Systemic Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Suppresses Colon Proliferation in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Functional Axis of PDE5/cGMP Mediates Timosaponin-AIII-Elicited Growth Suppression of Glioblastoma U87MG Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- How do phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors affect cancer? A focus on glioblastoma multiforme.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2022Review
- Inhibition of Colon Cancer Cell Growth by Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors Is Independent of cGMP Signaling.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsPhosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors have been proposed to have chemopreventative effects on colorectal cancer (CRC), although data are needed from population-based studies. We performed a nationwide cohort study to investigate the association between the use of PDE5 inhibitors and the risk of CRC in men with benign colorectal neoplasms.
methodsWe identified men who received a diagnosis of benign colorectal neoplasm from July 2005 through March 2015 who were listed in the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register. We linked data with those from other national Swedish registers to obtain information about the prescription of PDE5 inhibitors and CRC diagnoses. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsA total of 4823 patients were prescribed PDE5 inhibitors during the study period; the incidence rate of CRC was 2.64 per 1000 person-years for men prescribed PDE5 inhibitors compared with 4.46 per 1000 person-years for men without a prescription. We found a significant negative association between PDE5 inhibitor use and risk of CRC (adjusted HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.85); the decreased risk of CRC was associated with an increased cumulative dose of PDE5 inhibitors (P = .003). PDE5 prescription was associated with greater reduction in risk of advanced-stage CRC (adjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-1.00) than early-stage CRC (adjusted HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98), but the difference was not significant.
conclusionsIn a nationwide population-based study of men with a diagnosis of benign colorectal neoplasm in Sweden, we found evidence that use of PDE5 inhibitors is associated with a reduced risk of CRC. Further studies are needed to confirm the observed association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.