Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31103385›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography2019

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Nonelderly Patients Referred for Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography.

Sahar Taqui, Maros Ferencik, Brian P Davidson, J Todd Belcik, Federico Moccetti, Michael Layoun, Jacob Raber, Mitchell Turker, Hagai Tavori, Sergio Fazio and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Strengths and weaknesses of alternative noninvasive imaging approaches for microvascular ischemia.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sahar TaquiKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Maros FerencikKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Brian P DavidsonKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
J Todd BelcikKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Federico MoccettiKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Michael LayounKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jacob RaberDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience and Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Mitchell TurkerOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Hagai TavoriKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Sergio FazioKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jonathan R LindnerKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: lindnerj@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · USOregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Targeted CEU Imaging of Atherosclerosis and AngiogenesisR01HL078610 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI LINDNER, JONATHAN R · 2004 to 2022
$6.8M
Bioengineering a Chimeric Human LungR01HL120046 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SNOECK, HANS-WILLEM E, VUNJAK-NOVAKOVIC, GORDANA · 2013 to 2022
$6.1M
Augmentation of Tissue Perfusion with Ultrasound-mediated CavitationR01HL130046 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LINDNER, JONATHAN R · 2016 to 2023
$5.5M
Advanced Non-invasive Imaging in the Investigation of Aortic Stenosis PathobiologyR01HL165422 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Jonathan R Lindner · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL078610NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120046NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130046NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL165422NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrovascular dysfunction (MVD) is a potential cause of chest pain in younger individuals. The authors hypothesized that nonelderly patients referred for computed tomographic angiography (CTA) but without significant stenosis would have a high prevalence of MVD by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). Secondary aims were to test whether the presence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or reduced brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) predicted MVD.

methodsSubjects ≤60 years of age undergoing CTA were recruited if they had either no evidence of coronary plaque or evidence of mild CAD (<50% stenosis) and at least one high-risk plaque feature. Subjects underwent quantitative perfusion imaging using MCE at rest and during regadenoson vasodilator stress. MVD was defined as global or segmental delay of microvascular refill (≥2 sec) during regadenoson. FMD of the brachial artery was also performed.

resultsOf the 29 patients in whom MCE could be performed, 12 (41%) had MVD. These subjects, compared with those with normal microvascular function, had lower hyperemic perfusion (mean, 236 ± 68 vs 354 ± 161 intensity units/sec; P = .02) and microvascular flux rate (mean, 1.6 ± 0.4 vs 2.5 ± 0.9 sec

conclusionsMVD is a common finding in the nonelderly population referred for CTA for evaluation of possible CAD but without obstructive stenosis. Neither the presence of noncritical atherosclerotic disease nor abnormal FMD increases the likelihood for detecting MVD in this population.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyEchocardiographyAdultBrachial ArteryChest PainCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansIohexolMaleMicrovascular AnginaMiddle AgedOregonProspective StudiesPurinesPyrazolesIohexolPurinesPyrazolesregadenosonCT coronary angiographyMicrovascular dysfunctionMyocardial contrast echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID31103385
PMCPMC6527356
OpenAlexW2945196484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.