Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31102462›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Shading artifact correction in breast CT using an interleaved deep learning segmentation and maximum-likelihood polynomial fitting approach.

Peymon Ghazi, Andrew M Hernandez, Craig Abbey, Kai Yang, John M Boone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hybrid simulation of breast CT for assessing microcalcification detectability.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High-resolutionJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peymon GhaziMalcova LLC, Baltimore, MD, 21211, USA.
Andrew M HernandezDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Craig AbbeyDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Kai YangDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2114, USA.
John M BooneDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
A Prototype Stationary X-Ray Source Digital Breast Tomosynthesis SystemR01CA214515 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI SCHWOEBEL, PAUL R · 2017 to 2025
$3.1M
Breast CT: Final Steps to TranslationR01CA181081 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BOONE, JOHN M · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Modeling observer performance in low-dose CT assessmentsR01EB025829 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI ABBEY, CRAIG KENDALL · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181081NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214515NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025829NIH HHS P30 CA093373NIH HHS R01 CA181081NIH HHS R01 CA214515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this work was twofold: (a) To provide a robust and accurate method for image segmentation of dedicated breast CT (bCT) volume data sets, and (b) to improve Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy in bCT by means of a postprocessing method that uses the segmented images to correct for the low-frequency shading artifacts in reconstructed images.

methodsA sequential and iterative application of image segmentation and low-order polynomial fitting to bCT volume data sets was used in the interleaved correction (IC) method. Image segmentation was performed through a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) with a modified U-Net architecture. A total of 45 621 coronal bCT images from 111 patient volume data sets were segmented (using a previously published segmentation algorithm) and used for neural network training, validation, and testing. All patient data sets were selected from scans performed on four different prototype breast CT systems. The adipose voxels for each patient volume data set, segmented using the proposed CNN, were then fit to a three-dimensional low-order polynomial. The polynomial fit was subsequently used to correct for the shading artifacts introduced by scatter and beam hardening in a method termed "flat fielding." An interleaved utilization of image segmentation and flat fielding was repeated until a convergence criterion was satisfied. Mathematical and physical phantom studies were conducted to evaluate the dependence of the proposed algorithm on breast size and the distribution of fibroglandular tissue. In addition, a subset of patient scans (not used in the CNN training, testing or validation) were used to investigate the accuracy of the IC method across different scanner designs and beam qualities.

resultsThe IC method resulted in an accurate classification of different tissue types with an average Dice similarity coefficient > 95%, precision > 97%, recall > 95%, and F1-score > 96% across all tissue types. The flat fielding correction of bCT images resulted in a significant reduction in either cupping or capping artifacts in both mathematical and physical phantom studies as measured by the integral nonuniformity metric with an average reduction of 71% for cupping and 30% for capping across different phantom sizes, and the Uniformity Index with an average reduction of 53% for cupping and 34% for capping.

conclusionThe validation studies demonstrated that the IC method improves Hounsfield Units (HU) accuracy and effectively corrects for shading artifacts caused by scatter contamination and beam hardening. The postprocessing approach described herein is relevant to the broad scope of bCT devices and does not require any modification in hardware or existing scan protocols. The trained CNN parameters and network architecture are available for interested users.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDeep LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedBreastHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLikelihood FunctionsPhantoms, Imagingdedicated breast CTdeep learningimage segmentationshading artifacts

Identifiers

PMID31102462
PMCPMC8761082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.