ArticleMedical physics2019
Shading artifact correction in breast CT using an interleaved deep learning segmentation and maximum-likelihood polynomial fitting approach.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid simulation of breast CT for assessing microcalcification detectability.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Pre-whitened matched filter and convolutional neural network based model observer performance for mass lesion detection in non-contrast breast CT.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Model observer performance in contrast-enhanced lesions in breast CT: The influence of contrast concentration on detectability.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Hyperia: A novel methodology of developing anthropomorphic breast phantoms for X-ray imaging modalities - Part I: Concept and initial findings.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Prior information guided auto-contouring of breast gland for deformable image registration in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- High-resolutionJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Deep learning object detection of maxillary cyst-like lesions on panoramic radiographs: preliminary study.Oral radiology · 2021Article
- Computer-aided diagnosis of masses in breast computed tomography imaging: deep learning model with combined handcrafted and convolutional radiomic features.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Multi-marker quantitative radiomics for mass characterization in dedicated breast CT imaging.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Cone beam CT multisource configurations: evaluating image quality, scatter, and dose using phantom imaging and Monte Carlo simulations.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CT.Medical physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this work was twofold: (a) To provide a robust and accurate method for image segmentation of dedicated breast CT (bCT) volume data sets, and (b) to improve Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy in bCT by means of a postprocessing method that uses the segmented images to correct for the low-frequency shading artifacts in reconstructed images.
methodsA sequential and iterative application of image segmentation and low-order polynomial fitting to bCT volume data sets was used in the interleaved correction (IC) method. Image segmentation was performed through a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) with a modified U-Net architecture. A total of 45 621 coronal bCT images from 111 patient volume data sets were segmented (using a previously published segmentation algorithm) and used for neural network training, validation, and testing. All patient data sets were selected from scans performed on four different prototype breast CT systems. The adipose voxels for each patient volume data set, segmented using the proposed CNN, were then fit to a three-dimensional low-order polynomial. The polynomial fit was subsequently used to correct for the shading artifacts introduced by scatter and beam hardening in a method termed "flat fielding." An interleaved utilization of image segmentation and flat fielding was repeated until a convergence criterion was satisfied. Mathematical and physical phantom studies were conducted to evaluate the dependence of the proposed algorithm on breast size and the distribution of fibroglandular tissue. In addition, a subset of patient scans (not used in the CNN training, testing or validation) were used to investigate the accuracy of the IC method across different scanner designs and beam qualities.
resultsThe IC method resulted in an accurate classification of different tissue types with an average Dice similarity coefficient > 95%, precision > 97%, recall > 95%, and F1-score > 96% across all tissue types. The flat fielding correction of bCT images resulted in a significant reduction in either cupping or capping artifacts in both mathematical and physical phantom studies as measured by the integral nonuniformity metric with an average reduction of 71% for cupping and 30% for capping across different phantom sizes, and the Uniformity Index with an average reduction of 53% for cupping and 34% for capping.
conclusionThe validation studies demonstrated that the IC method improves Hounsfield Units (HU) accuracy and effectively corrects for shading artifacts caused by scatter contamination and beam hardening. The postprocessing approach described herein is relevant to the broad scope of bCT devices and does not require any modification in hardware or existing scan protocols. The trained CNN parameters and network architecture are available for interested users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.