ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2019
Utilization patterns and performance of commercial myositis autoantibody panels in routine clinical practice.
Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective analysis of myositis-specific antibody-positive veteran survival between 2011 and 2023.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with dermatomyositis using real-world data.RMD open · 2026Article
- Five genes as diagnostic biomarkers of dermatomyositis and their correlation with immune cell infiltration.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Accuracy of commercial panels to evaluate myositis autoantibodies: A single-institution perspective.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2021Article
- The reliability of immunoassays to detect autoantibodies in patients with myositis is dependent on autoantibody specificity.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.