Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31102206›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2019

How Successful is Switching from Bevacizumab or Ranibizumab to Aflibercept in Age-Related Macular Degeneration? A Systematic Overview.

Theodoros Empeslidis, Matthew Storey, Theodoros Giannopoulos, Vassileios Konidaris, Paris G Tranos, Evangelia S Panagiotou, Irini C Voudouragkaki, Anastasios G Konstas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-term choroidal thickness changes based on the subtype of macular neovascularization in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (5-year follow-up).Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  8. Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: insights into drug-switch real-world from the Berlin Macular Registry.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Long-term switching between ranibizumab and aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Theodoros EmpeslidisMedical Retina Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Matthew StoreyMedical Retina Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Theodoros Giannopoulos1st Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vassileios KonidarisMedical Retina Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Paris G TranosOphthalmica Eye Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Evangelia S Panagiotou1st Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Irini C Voudouragkaki1st Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anastasios G Konstas1st and 3rd University Departments of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. konstas@med.auth.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) have revolutionised medical retina practice and the management and eventual outcome of nAMD. Recent research has focused on evaluating and comparing the efficacy of the two most widely employed anti-VEGF agents, bevacizumab and ranibizumab; however, a subgroup of patients with nAMD demonstrates a suboptimal response to standard therapy. We have therefore conducted a review of pertinent studies published until August 2018 which have documented the clinical efficacy when switching to a different anti-VEGF. Evidence on baseline disease characteristics, injection frequency and disease outcome has been obtained for patients treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg and/or bevacizumab 1.25 mg and were switched to aflibercept 2 mg. Our review identified 45 studies investigating switching to aflibercept. Our review showed a clear anatomical benefit after the switch in terms of central retinal thickness and pigment epithelium detachment characteristics, whereas the functional outcomes were variable. Remarkable heterogeneity was documented among the relevant studies with regard to several factors including the baseline characteristics of the cohorts, the non-response definition and previous treatment protocols. Larger prospective trials with appropriate control arms are therefore required to elucidate the potential benefit when switching between anti-VEGF agents in refractory nAMD.

Indexed as

Drug SubstitutionAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabHumansMacular DegenerationRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTreatment OutcomeafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAfliberceptAnti-VEGFBevacizumabMacular degenerationRanibizumab

Identifiers

PMID31102206
PMCPMC6824395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.