Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31102175›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2019

The Ethics of the Societal Entrenchment-approach and the case of live uterus transplantation-IVF.

Lisa Guntram, Kristin Zeiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa GuntramDepartment of Thematic Studies - Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. lisa.guntram@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-0308
Kristin ZeilerDepartment of Thematic Studies - Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Riksbankens Jubileumsfond SCASS Pro Futura Scientia Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2014, the first child in the world was born after live uterus transplantation and IVF (UTx-IVF). Before and after this event, ethical aspects of UTx-IVF have been discussed in the medical and bioethical debate as well as, with varying intensity, in Swedish media and political fora. This article examines what comes to be identified as important ethical problems and solutions in the media debate of UTx-IVF in Sweden, showing specifically how problems, target groups, goals, benefits, risks and stakes are delineated and positioned. It also demonstrates how specific assumptions, norms and values are expressed and used to underpin specific positions within this debate, and how certain subjects, desires and risks become shrouded or simply omitted from it. This approach-which we label the Ethics of the Societal Entrenchment-approach, inspired by Koch and Stemerding (1994)-allows us to discuss how the identification of something as the problem helps to shape what gets to be described as a solution, and how specific solutions provide frameworks within which problems can be stated and emphasised. We also offer a critical discussion of whether some of these articulations and formations should be seen as ethically troubling, and if so, why.

Indexed as

FemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInventionsParentsParturitionPregnancyRisk AssessmentSwedenTissue and Organ ProcurementUterusDiscourseEmpirical ethicsEthical problemsSocietal entrenchmentSurrogacyUterus transplantation

Identifiers

PMID31102175
PMCPMC6842335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.