Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31102144›Full record

Trial reportDrug safety2019

Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Patients with Chronic Migraine: Results of the COMPEL Study.

Paul K Winner, Andrew M Blumenfeld, Eric J Eross, Amelia C Orejudos, Debbie L Mirjah, Aubrey Manack Adams, Mitchell F Brin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01516892 (A Long-term Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study of BOTOX® in Patients With Chronic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01516892 phase4completednot on this map

A Long-term Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study of BOTOX® in Patients With Chronic Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2011 to 2015Enrolled716ConditionsMigraine DisordersArmsonabotulinumtoxinA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Approach to Pediatric Intractable Migraine.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paul K WinnerPalm Beach Headache Center, Premiere Research Institute@Palm Beach Neurology, 4631 N. Congress Ave, Suite 200, West Palm Beach, FL, 33407, USA. pwinner777@aol.com.
Andrew M BlumenfeldHeadache Center of Southern California, The Neurology Center, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
Eric J ErossThe Phoenix Headache Institute, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Amelia C OrejudosAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Debbie L MirjahAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Aubrey Manack AdamsAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Mitchell F BrinAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Allergan (United States) · USNeurology Center of Southern California · USPremiere Research Institute · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOnabotulinumtoxinA is approved in the USA for the prevention of headache in adults with chronic migraine, a debilitating neurologic disease characterized by headaches occurring on ≥ 15 days per month for > 3 months and including migraine features on ≥ 8 days per month.

objectiveThe COMPEL Study (NCT01516892), a 108-week, multi-center, open-label study, evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA in adults with chronic migraine. The objective of this subanalysis was to examine the safety and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA after each of nine treatment cycles.

methodsOnabotulinumtoxinA 155 U was administered every 12 weeks. Safety and tolerability, overall and by treatment cycle, were assessed. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported between successive treatments were attributed to the preceding treatment. The safety population received one or more doses of onabotulinumtoxinA. The primary efficacy outcome was the reduction in headache days at week 108 compared with baseline.

resultsOf 716 patients enrolled, 373 patients (52.1%) completed the study and 343 (47.9%) withdrew; 481 patients (67.2%) received 60 weeks of treatment and 402 (56.1%) received 108 weeks of treatment. In total, 436 (60.9%) patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events; most were mild/moderate in severity. Thirty-two patients (4.5%) discontinued the study after experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events typically decreased with repeated onabotulinumtoxinA treatment: first cycle, 24.2%; fourth cycle, 18.4%; ninth cycle, 12.2%. Neck pain (2.7%), eyelid ptosis (1.8%), musculoskeletal stiffness (1.4%), injection-site pain (1.3%), and headache (1.3%) were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events after the first cycle. Seventy-five patients (10.5%) reported serious treatment-emergent adverse events, 13 (1.8%) withdrew. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by 131 patients (18.3%), one was considered serious. OnabotulinumtoxinA significantly reduced headache day frequency by 10.7 (6.4) days per 28-day period (p < 0.0001) at week 108.

conclusionsOnabotulinumtoxinA treatment was well tolerated over 108 weeks; no new safety signals were identified. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and the most common individual events decreased with repeated onabotulinumtoxinA administration. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01516892.

Indexed as

AdultBotulinum Toxins, Type AChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMigraine DisordersProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingBotulinum Toxins, Type Aonabotulinum toxin A

Identifiers

PMID31102144
PMCPMC6647876
OpenAlexW2946236143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.