Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31102111›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Running Biomechanics in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Benoit Pairot-de-Fontenay, Richard W Willy, Audrey R C Elias, Ryan L Mizner, Marc-Olivier Dubé, Jean-Sébastien Roy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05643261 (Can a Strength and Technique Intervention Reduce Knee Abduction Moment in Young Female Handball Players), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05643261 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Can a Strength and Technique Intervention Reduce Knee Abduction Moment in Young Female Handball Players

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorges idrettshøgskoleRan2022 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsACL InjuryArmsMuscle and technique training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current Rehabilitation Principles Following Meniscus Repairs.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Biomechanics during cutting movement in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benoit Pairot-de-FontenayCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada.
Richard W WillySchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Montana, 135 Skaggs Building, Missoula, MT, 59812-4680, USA. richard.willy@mso.umt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-228X
Audrey R C EliasSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Montana, 135 Skaggs Building, Missoula, MT, 59812-4680, USA.
Ryan L MiznerSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Montana, 135 Skaggs Building, Missoula, MT, 59812-4680, USA.
Marc-Olivier DubéCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada.
Jean-Sébastien RoyCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA return to running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is critical to the clinical success of any cutting and pivoting athlete who wishes to return to sport. Knowledge of specific alterations during running after ACL-R is required to optimise rehabilitation for improving outcomes and long-term disability.

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to summarise kinematic, kinetic and muscle activation data during running after ACL-R and the intrinsic factors (e.g. surgical technique and strength asymmetries) affecting running biomechanics.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to 10 December, 2018. The search identified studies comparing kinematic, kinetic or muscle activation data during running between the involved limb and contralateral or control limbs. Studies analysing the effect of intrinsic factors in the ACL-R group were also included. Risk of bias was assessed, qualitative and quantitative analyses performed, and levels of evidence determined.

resultsA total of 1993 papers were identified and 25 were included for analysis. Pooled analyses reported a deficit of knee flexion motion and internal knee extension moment, compared with both contralateral or control limbs, during the stance phase of running from 3 months to 5 years after ACL-R (strong evidence). Inconsistent results were found for both peak vertical ground reaction force and impact forces after ACL-R. Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint contact forces differed from both contralateral or control limbs up until at least 2.5 years after ACL-R and moderate evidence indicated no difference for muscle activations during moderate speed running. Quadriceps and hamstring strength asymmetries, and knee function, but not surgical techniques, were likely to be associated with both knee kinematics and kinetics during running after ACL-R.

conclusionAfter ACL-R, knee flexion motion and internal knee extension moment are the most affected variables and are consistently smaller in the injured limb during running when pooling evidence. Clinicians should be aware that these deficits do not appear to resolve with time and, thus, specific clinical interventions may be needed to reduce long-term disability. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered in PROSPERO 2017, CRD42017077130.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHamstring MusclesHumansKnee JointMuscle StrengthQuadriceps MuscleRange of Motion, ArticularRunning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.