Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31102102›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2019

Differences in Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis by Ethnicity, Insurance Status, and Family Income in Young Women in the USA.

Maria Alice Franzoi, Gilberto Schwartsmann, Sérgio Jobim de Azevedo, Guilherme Geib, Facundo Zaffaroni, Pedro E R Liedke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gland surgery · 2020
    Article
  11. Sociodemographic and Clinical-pathological Study of Molecular Subtitles of Breast Carcinoma in a Reference Unit of Maranhão.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Breast cancer in young black women.The British journal of surgery · 2020
    Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Alice FranzoiDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil. franzoi.alice@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2470-6054
Gilberto SchwartsmannDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil.
Sérgio Jobim de AzevedoDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil.
Guilherme GeibDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil.
Facundo ZaffaroniLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group - LACOG, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Pedro E R LiedkeDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BREastern Cooperative Oncology Group · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDescribe the clinical and epidemiological data from young women with breast cancer and determine the association between ethnicity, insurance status, family income, and breast cancer stage at the diagnosis in this population.

methodsWomen under the age of 40 diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010 to 2014 and identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database were included. Binary logistic regression was applied in order to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for factors that were potentially predictive for receiving a breast cancer diagnosis at stage I.

resultsOf 14,379 young women with invasive breast cancer, 70.9% of the patients were white, 15.9% black, and 13.2% classified as other ethnicity (American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander). The initial clinical stage at diagnosis was stage I in 28.2%, II in 45.2%, III in 19.0%, and IV in 7.6%. The chi-square test showed a significant association between clinical stage at diagnosis and family income (p < 0.0001), insurance status (p < 0.0001), and ethnicity (p < 0.0001). The ORs for being diagnosed at stage I, regarding different factors, revealed that women with family income higher than US$ 85,000 were more likely to be diagnosed with stage I (OR [95%CI], 1.306 [1.173-1.454]; p value < 0.0001) when compared with patients with family income of less than US$ 60,000. Black women were less likely to be diagnosed with stage I (OR [95%CI], 0.676 [0.605-0.755]; p value < 0.0001), when compared with white women. Uninsured women were less likely to be diagnosed with stage I (OR [95%CI], 0.586 [0.529-0.648]; p value < 0.0001) when compared with women with insurance coverage.

conclusionAmong young US women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, most of them presented early stage disease. Women with black ethnicity, low income, and uninsured are at risk for late-stage presentation. Improvements in strategies to allow earlier breast cancer diagnosis in these at risk population are urged.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsEthnicityFemaleHumansIncomeInsurance CoverageNeoplasm StagingRegistriesUnited StatesYoung AdultBreast cancer stagingEthnic disparitiesSocioeconomic disparities

Identifiers

PMID31102102
OpenAlexW2946096742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.