Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31102086›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2019

Towards reaching consensus on hyaluronic acid efficacy in knee osteoarthritis.

Larry E Miller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larry E MillerMiller Scientific Consulting, 1854 Hendersonville Road, #231, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA. larry@millerscientific.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1594-1885
Foster-Miller (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) is a controversial treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). While clinical efficacy of HA relative to saline injections has been demonstrated in many studies, these results are of limited value in real-world clinical practice since saline injection is not a knee OA treatment. Instead, rigorous postmarket comparative studies of HA versus approved knee OA treatments are encouraged. The conduct of such studies is particularly important given the paucity and heterogeneous nature of current evidence regarding nonsurgical knee OA treatment. KEY POINTS: • Societal guidelines recommend nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroid injections, but not hyaluronic acid injections, for knee osteoarthritis (OA) despite inconsistent supportive data. • This article encourages rigorous comparative post-approval studies to clarify the role of nonsurgical treatments used in clinical practice for knee OA.

Indexed as

Injections, Intra-ArticularAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalConsensusGuidelines as TopicHumansHyaluronic AcidOsteoarthritis, KneeProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingResearch DesignRheumatologySocieties, MedicalTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHyaluronic AcidCorticosteroidInjectionNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsViscosupplementation

Identifiers

PMID31102086
OpenAlexW2945138861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.