ArticleRheumatology international2019
Performance of the American College of Rheumatology 2016 criteria for fibromyalgia in a referral care setting.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reevaluating fibromyalgia diagnosis: a proposal to integrate deep tendon reflex responses into current criteria.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- How to Promote Walking in Women with Fibromyalgia: A Look at Catastrophizing, Goal Conflict, and Avoidance from a Self-Emotional Regulatory Perspective.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Complex Web of Fibromyalgia: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Summaries of the Padua symposium on myofascial pain, fibromyalgia, and fascial pain disorders, June 2023,European journal of translational myology · 2023Article
- Prevalence of fibromyalgia among university students and its impact on their health-related quality of life: a survey-based study from Egypt.BMC public health · 2023Article
- The role of ultrasonographic synovial assessment in rheumatoid arthritis patients with concomitant fibromyalgia.Archives of rheumatology · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and adverse effects of the use of mirtazapine as compared to duloxetine for fibromyalgia: real-life data from a retrospective cohort.Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Gender influence on clinical manifestations, depressive symptoms and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum levels in patients affected by fibromyalgia.Clinical rheumatology · 2022Article
- Assessing Walking Programs in Fibromyalgia: A Concordance Study between Measures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Link between Fibromyalgia Syndrome and Anger: A Systematic Review Revealing Research Gaps.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Are Pacing Patterns Really Based on Value Goals? Exploring the Contextual Role of Pain Acceptance and Pain Catastrophizing in Women with Fibromyalgia.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2021Article
- Assessing our approach to diagnosing Fibromyalgia.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2020Review
- Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia: Critical Review and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Performance of 2016 revised fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2016 criteria for fibromyalgia (FM) is recommended for use in primary and referral setting. However, neither the ACR 2016 nor its predecessor ACR 2010 criteria have been validated in a referral setting. We hypothesized that the presence of higher comorbidities in the referral care setting may affect the performance of the ACR 2016. All patients referred to a tertiary care hospital with widespread pain for more than 3 months were screened using (1) the ACR 2016 criteria and (2) by a blinded expert physician (using ACR 1990 criteria). Using the ACR 1990 as reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Also, concomitant depression (BPHQ: Brief Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety disorder (GAD7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and alexithymia (TAS-20: Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20) were screened for using standardized instruments. Other central sensitization syndromes were also screened clinically. Of 147 patients (132 females; median age 36 [30-45] years, median symptom duration 4 [1-6] years), 112 met the ACR 1990 criteria while 93 met the ACR 2016 criteria. There was disagreement between the two criteria in 47 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of ACR 2016 were 71% and 60%, respectively. Patients diagnosed by ACR 2016 criteria alone, had higher GAD7 scores than those diagnosed by the ACR 1990 alone. However, BPHQ and TAS-20 did not differ between the groups. Patients diagnosed by the ACR 2016 criteria had a greater odds (OR 5.2 CI 1.3-21.7, p = 0.022) of having concomitant restless leg syndrome or post-traumatic stress disorder or chronic fatigue syndrome. The sensitivity/specificity of the ACR 2016 in tertiary settings matched those found in previous primary care-based studies. Thus, the ACR 2016 criteria are valid for use in the tertiary setting. However, patients diagnosed by only the ACR 2016 criteria (and not by the ACR 1990) have high probability of having another concomitant comorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31101966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.