Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31101966›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2019

Performance of the American College of Rheumatology 2016 criteria for fibromyalgia in a referral care setting.

Sakir Ahmed, Amita Aggarwal, Able Lawrence

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing Walking Programs in Fibromyalgia: A Concordance Study between Measures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Assessing our approach to diagnosing Fibromyalgia.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sakir AhmedDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-311X
Amita AggarwalDepartment of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, 226014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-5186
Able LawrenceDepartment of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, 226014, India. abledoc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3439-8048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2016 criteria for fibromyalgia (FM) is recommended for use in primary and referral setting. However, neither the ACR 2016 nor its predecessor ACR 2010 criteria have been validated in a referral setting. We hypothesized that the presence of higher comorbidities in the referral care setting may affect the performance of the ACR 2016. All patients referred to a tertiary care hospital with widespread pain for more than 3 months were screened using (1) the ACR 2016 criteria and (2) by a blinded expert physician (using ACR 1990 criteria). Using the ACR 1990 as reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Also, concomitant depression (BPHQ: Brief Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety disorder (GAD7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and alexithymia (TAS-20: Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20) were screened for using standardized instruments. Other central sensitization syndromes were also screened clinically. Of 147 patients (132 females; median age 36 [30-45] years, median symptom duration 4 [1-6] years), 112 met the ACR 1990 criteria while 93 met the ACR 2016 criteria. There was disagreement between the two criteria in 47 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of ACR 2016 were 71% and 60%, respectively. Patients diagnosed by ACR 2016 criteria alone, had higher GAD7 scores than those diagnosed by the ACR 1990 alone. However, BPHQ and TAS-20 did not differ between the groups. Patients diagnosed by the ACR 2016 criteria had a greater odds (OR 5.2 CI 1.3-21.7, p = 0.022) of having concomitant restless leg syndrome or post-traumatic stress disorder or chronic fatigue syndrome. The sensitivity/specificity of the ACR 2016 in tertiary settings matched those found in previous primary care-based studies. Thus, the ACR 2016 criteria are valid for use in the tertiary setting. However, patients diagnosed by only the ACR 2016 criteria (and not by the ACR 1990) have high probability of having another concomitant comorbidity.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultAffectAffective SymptomsAnxiety DisordersComorbidityConsensusCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleFibromyalgiaHealth StatusHumansIndiaMaleMental HealthDiagnosisFibromyalgiaStress disorders, posttraumatic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.