Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31101954›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019

Long-term cosmetic outcome after preoperative radio-/chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients.

Christiane Matuschek, Carolin Nestle-Kraemling, Jan Haussmann, Edwin Bölke, Sylvia Wollandt, Vanessa Speer, Freddy Joel Djiepmo Njanang, Bálint Tamaskovics, Peter Arne Gerber, Klaus Orth and 9 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implant-based reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients-current status and DEGRO recommendations.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of PreoperativeFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Long-term quality of life after preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with localized and locally advanced breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Recent advances in radiotherapy of breast cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christiane MatuschekMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Carolin Nestle-KraemlingDepartment of Senology, Gynecology and Obstetrics, EVK, Teaching Hospital Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Jan HaussmannMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Edwin BölkeMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany. boelke@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Sylvia WollandtDepartment of Senology, Sana Kliniken Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Vanessa SpeerMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Freddy Joel Djiepmo NjanangMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Bálint TamaskovicsMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Peter Arne GerberDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Klaus OrthDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Harzkliniken, Goslar, Germany.
Eugen RuckhaeberleDepartment of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Tanja FehmDepartment of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University, Munich, Germany.
Guido LammeringRadiotherapy Insitute, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.
Svjetlana MohrmannDepartment of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Werner AudretschDepartment of Senology and Breast Surgery, Marienhospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Stephan RothMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Kai KammersDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Wilfried BudachMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEFederal Highway Research Institute · DELMU Klinikum · DEMarien Hospital Düsseldorf · DESidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (PRT/PCRT) represent an increasingly used clinical strategy in different tumor sites. We have previously reported on a PRT/PRCT protocol in patients with locally advanced non-inflammatory breast cancer (LABC) with promising clinical results. However, concerns regarding a possible unfavorable influence on cosmesis still exist. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine long-term cosmetic outcome in our series of LABC patients treated with PRT/PCRT followed by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (ME). PATIENTS AND

methodsOf the 315 patients treated with PRT/PCRT in the years 1991 to 1999, 203 were still alive at long-term follow-up of mean 17.7 years (range 14-21). Thirty-seven patients were lost to follow-up and 58 patients refused to be contacted, which resulted in 107 patients (64 patients after BCS and 43 after mastectomy) being available and willing to undergo further cosmetic assessment. One patient had a complete response after PRT/PCRT and refused surgery. PRT/PCRT consisted of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with 50 Gy (5 × 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with a consecutive electron boost or (in case of BCS) a 10-Gy interstitial brachytherapy boost with Ir-192 prior to EBRT. Overall, chemotherapy was administered either prior to RT or concomitantly in the majority of patients. BCS and mastectomy were performed with and without reconstruction. The cosmetic outcome was assessed by patient questionnaire, panel evaluation, and breast retraction assessment (BRA) score.

resultsEighty percent of all BCS patients rated their overall cosmetic result as "excellent" or "good" as compared to 55.8% after mastectomy. Patient and panel ratings on cosmetic outcomes were similar between the two groups. No grade III or IV fibrosis were detected in any of the groups. The median BRA score after breast conserving surgery was 2.9.

conclusionPRT/PCRT is associated with low grades of fibrosis and a good to excellent long-term cosmetic outcome.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyEstheticsMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic IrradiationMammaplastyMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsBreast conserving surgeryCosmesisMastectomyPanel ratingPatient rating

Identifiers

PMID31101954
OpenAlexW2946453288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.